0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why might a scientist rethink their hypothesis?
The scientists might Rethink there Hypothesis because when they collect more data they would know more about what they are doing so they would rethink there hypothesis
What is the hypothesis of the strange case of beriberi?
Scientist thought it might be cause by bacteria.
When a scientist makes an educated guess about what the right answer to a science experiment might be?
This is called a hypothesis.
Hypothesis about avocado?
A hypothesis is a question that a scientist comes up with, which will later form the basis of experiments or testing which will attempt to answer the hypothesis. For an avocado, an interesting hypothesis might be, 'Will the pit of an avocado grow hydroponically?'
What do scientist revive before forming hypothesis?
Revivification is not particularly associated with the process of forming a hypothesis. Speculatively, a scientist might revive his or her own imagination before venturing a hypothesis. But then, that would presume that the imagination had previously become dormant, and there is no reason to think that.
Does a scientist consider a hypothesis to be a fact?
Scientist consider hypothesis to be an educated guess on what they are studying. If that scientist researches and experiments more, he will see if his hypothesis is true or false.
What options does a scientist have if experiment does not support hypothesis?
a scientist can do another experiment or change their hypothesis.
After a hypothesis what do scienrist do?
the scientist proposed a theory after hypothesis.
Why do scientist form hypothesis?
A scientist forms hypothesis to better conduct an experiment. He or she asks a question, then forms a hypothesis, or prediction, so that they are better prepared for a likely outcome of their experiment. If they don't try to guess what might happen, they might not come prepared and could be injured or unsucessful in their collection of data.
What does a scientist do if hypothsis is not supported?
make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist
What do scientist do when their data does not support their hypothesis?
Discard or change the hypothesis.
What should a scientist do if a hypothesis is not supported?
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
