They would find what theory this evidence supports instead (according to AQA exam mark sheet)
Scientists should carefully analyze the new evidence and conduct further research to understand its implications. They should evaluate whether this evidence challenges the current understanding of the Big Bang theory or if it can be integrated into the theory with modifications. Open-mindedness, critical thinking, and rigorous testing are essential in assessing the impact of new evidence on scientific theories.
Because the theory fits all the evidence so far. There are still difficulties with it and more questions need to be answered but it seems to be the best theory at present.
Scientists may reject a theory if new evidence contradicts it, if it fails to make accurate predictions, or if a better theory emerges that explains the data more effectively. Rejection of a theory is a normal part of the scientific process as it leads to the refinement and advancement of knowledge.
A theory must have explanatory power, predictive ability, and be falsifiable. It should also be based on empirical evidence and be able to be tested and refined through scientific methods.
The theory of relativity is accepted by scientists because it has been extensively tested through experiments and observations, and it has consistently provided accurate predictions that have been confirmed. It also provides a more comprehensive and accurate description of gravity, spacetime, and the behavior of objects at high speeds compared to classical physics.
Sometimes the scientists can't think of a suitable theory to explain their results but publish their experiments anyway to provide data for others so maybe another scientist can create a theory.
For their own benefits.
modify the theory or discard it altogether.
me and your mom
Scientists had made observations that did not fit exactly with Dalton's theory. Scientists changed the atomic theory to include this new knowledge. While the modern atomic theory is based on Dalton's theory, it is also very different.
In the 1960's scientists uncovered new evidence that seemed to support Wegener's theory.
At the time when this theory was a-brewing, it was difficult to provide conclusive data and evidence.
There was no evidence to prove it
Fossils.
Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
Dalton used his atomic theory to explain and predict the behavior of gases, particularly in his work on combining volumes of gases in chemical reactions. This provided experimental evidence that supported the atomic theory and ultimately led to its acceptance by scientists.
Each scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.
Wegener's theory of continental drift is supported by a vast quantity of evidence, which is why scientists have accepted it.