0
Of course The Bible first proposed young earth creationism on account of their being a fairly strict chronology given in scripture. The descendants of Adam along with the number of years separating the patriarchs and a apporoximate time for the kings of Judah, includes a rough estimate of when the earth was created and when the Great Flood occurred. It was beginning in the mid-nineteenth century when various British theologians considered the possibility that the Bible should not be taken too literally and that the geology and science contradicted the scriptural record. The travels and subsequent ideas of Charles Darwin convinced many they were on the right track. (Of course, some only believed in an ancient earth after Darwin's book was published.) Ironically it was mostly clergymen on both sides of the Atlantic that promoted the idea of the earth being many millions of years old. It is also ironic that almost 100 years before scientific dating, Charles Lyell, came out with his classic geology text that amazingly and accurately (!) already accounted for the many millions of years separating our currently accepted geological eras. Modern belief in a young earth arose in the late 1950s and 60s with the classic apology for young earth creatiionism, The Genesis Flood, by Henry Morris and John Whitcomb. Here was a text of over 500 pages that invoked selective scientific evidence for a young earth, in many cases from the writings and abstracts of evolutionists themselves. For some, the history of our earth and universe seemed to make sense for the first time and the inerrant accuracy of scripture was once again restored. The impact of The Genesis Flood cannot be underestimated as it exposed a soft underbelly of evolutionism many had never considered before. Perhaps it was from this point onward that a real threat to established scientific convention began to emerge and many scientists began classifying creationism as pseudoscience while believers readily saw evolutionism as a religion on its own called scientific naturalism. The Intelligent Design movement is not necessarily a young earth creationist movement but rather a movement emerging from the university environment that tried to uncouple creationism with the Bible and its largely Baptist roots.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the two kinds of Creationism?
1) In order to reconcile Creation with Evolution, Old-Earth Creationism holds that God made the universe and then guided Evolution over long epochs.2) In repudiation of Evolution, Young-Earth Creationismholds that God created the universe and living things relatively recently without the use of Evolution.See also the Related Links.Link: Evidence for CreationLink: Can you show that God existsLink: God's wisdom seen in His creations
What is Young Earth creationism?
== == Young Earth Creationism is one of two streams into which Creationism can be divided (the other being Old Earth Creationism which also accepts a divine creator, but agrees with mainstream science that the scientific evidence points to the world being immensely old and that species have evolved through the process of evolution). Young Earth Creationism is a world-view that interprets scientific evidence based on a literal or semi-literal reading of the Biblical book of Genesis and thus teaches that the world is only about 6,000 years old. Young Earth Creationists believe that living things were created by God much as we know them today and that the various species have diversified within the genetic pool of their original kind.
What are the old earth creationism theories?
OEC is an umbrella term for various ideas on the Creation. These include the Gap Theory and Progressive Creationism. Suggest you look it up via the phrase 'old earth creationism' as it it too long to summarize here.
According to creationism how old is the earth?
According to creationism, the Earth is less than 10,000 years old, and is usually found to be around 6,000 years old. This results from an interpretation of Biblical genealogies.
Who proposed the tidal theory of the earth?
Joseph Andrew Penuliar
What are the two kinds of Creationism?
1) In order to reconcile Creation with Evolution, Old-Earth Creationism holds that God made the universe and then guided Evolution over long epochs.2) In repudiation of Evolution, Young-Earth Creationismholds that God created the universe and living things relatively recently without the use of Evolution.See also the Related Links.Link: Evidence for CreationLink: Can you show that God existsLink: God's wisdom seen in His creations
What are some good websites for creationism?
Creationism is the belief that the earth and living things derive from explicit acts of Divine Creation. For young-Earth creationists, this comprises a literal understanding of the Book of Genesis and the disbelief in Evolution. Here are some websites for creationism including young-earth, old-earth, and intelligent design creationism. Answers in Genesis: Young-earth creationist department, which operates a Creation Museum. Access Research Network: Advocates of Intellectual Design Creationism. Center for Science and Culture: Intelligent design belief. Part of the Seattle-based Discovery Institute. Creation Ministries International: Young-earth creationists. Creation Research Society: Research arm of the creation Institute. Institute for Creation Research: A central group of young-earth creationism.
Compare and contrast young and old creationism?
Young Earth creationism asserts that the earth and universe were created by God in a literal six days about 6,000-10,000 years ago, as described in the Bible, whereas Old Earth creationism accommodates scientific dating methods and allows for a much older age of the earth and universe, but still believes in a divine creator. Both views seek to reconcile scientific and religious beliefs, but differ in their interpretations of the age of the earth and universe.
Why do many Christian denominations reject the concept of young-earth creationism?
Many Christian denominations realise that the concepts of young-earth creationism are implausible. They have to accept the facts of science or risk being seen as irrelevant by an increasing number of parishioners.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Is creationism credible?
There are at least two, quite different forms of creationism, and the question of whether creationism is credible must be applied separately to each. No doubt, both Young-Earth creationism and Old-Earth creationism are credible to their proponents, but the question must be whether they are credible to other well informed people.Young-Earth creationism holds that the Earth is only a few thousand years old, usually around six thousand. However, science has proven conclusively that the world is billions of years old, so this can not be credible. Because of the overwhelming evidence that the world is certainly more than six thousand years old, some Young-Earth creationists have adapted Young-Earth creationism by saying that each of the days stated in Genesis chapter 1 was really an almost indefinite period of time. According to this version, the world could be many thousands of years old. This not only undermines the standard Young-Earth creationism argument, but it is even less credible, given that there is no supporting evidence for this, not even biblical evidence.Old-Earth creationism accepts the scientific evidence for the great age of the Earth, so from this point of view it is more credible than Young-Earth creationism. Nevertheless, some Old-Earth creationists say that God created all living things just as they are today. Others accept that species evolved, but say that this was not the result of natural selection but Intelligent Design. Both versions of Old-Earth creationism fail in the face of scientific evidence, although Intelligent Design is more sophisticated and therefore somewhat more credible. Intelligent Design is also claimed by some Young-Earth creationists, perhaps because it has captured the imagination of a proportion of the population, but it seems inherently an Old-Earth creationism concept.Ultimately credibility comes down to whether a hypothesis is compatible with the scientific evidence. Creationists do not put forward scientific evidence to support their hypotheses, instead proposing various ways in which they believe they can undermine the evidence for evolution. Occasionally, scientists respond (eg. Dawkins, Perakh, et al)and demonstrate the failure of these arguments. So, to be credible, creationism has to adapt further, until its claims are at least somewhat consistent with the scientific evidence.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
How can creationism and evolutionism co-exist?
reconciliation of Creation with Evolution is the view of Old-Earth Creationism, which holds that God made the universe and then guided Evolution over long epochs.In repudiation of Evolution, however, Young-Earth Creationism holds that God created the universe and living things relatively recently without the use of Evolution.See also:Is there evidence for Creation?Can you show that God exists?Seeing God's wisdom
What is Young Earth creationism?
== == Young Earth Creationism is one of two streams into which Creationism can be divided (the other being Old Earth Creationism which also accepts a divine creator, but agrees with mainstream science that the scientific evidence points to the world being immensely old and that species have evolved through the process of evolution). Young Earth Creationism is a world-view that interprets scientific evidence based on a literal or semi-literal reading of the Biblical book of Genesis and thus teaches that the world is only about 6,000 years old. Young Earth Creationists believe that living things were created by God much as we know them today and that the various species have diversified within the genetic pool of their original kind.
What do Christians think about old earth versus new earth theory?
Christians are divided between; From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Old Earth creationism is a variant of the creationist view of the origin of the universe and life on Earth. As a theory of origins it is typically more compatible with mainstream scientific thought on the issues of geology, cosmology and the age of the Earth, in comparison to Young Earth creationism. However, it still generally takes the accounts of creation in Genesis more literally than theistic evolution (or evolutionary creationism).Old Earth creationism is in fact an umbrella term for a number of perspectives, including Gap creationism and Progressive creationism. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaYoung Earth creationism is the religious belief that the Earth and life on Earth were created by a direct act of God dating between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago. Its adherents are Christians, Muslims or Jews who believe that God created the Earth in six 24-hour days, taking the Hebrew text of Genesis as a literal account.
Is creationism a myth?
Creationism comes in two significantly different varieties. Traditional creationism, often known as ‘Young-earth Creationism’ holds that the world was created in just six days, and only a few thousand years ago. Old-earth Creationists accept that science has proven its case, that the world is over four billion years old. They seek to harmonise this with the Bible by looking for innovative ways of interpreting the Book of Genesis, to allow both science and the Bible to be seen as true.Many people now believe the biblical account of creation to be a myth, but 'creationism' is more than a myth. Whether we look at Young-earth Creationism or Old-earth Creationism, it is a quite modern set of beliefs designed to support belief in God as the ultimate creator of the world.
What are the old earth creationism theories?
OEC is an umbrella term for various ideas on the Creation. These include the Gap Theory and Progressive Creationism. Suggest you look it up via the phrase 'old earth creationism' as it it too long to summarize here.
Can the sun be part of creationism?
Stop and think about it. If you are into creationism, then what won't be included? People who take the approach of creationism believe that absolutely everything, without exception, was created. You might be asking if creationists believe that solar processes may have been involved in various changes that have happened to earth and her inventory of living and non-living things. That would probably depend on what branch of creationism you are talking about. "Young Earth" creationists probably hold more to an absolute, fundamentalist approach to creation, with little if anything resulting from lengthy 'natural' processes. Other creationists dismiss 'young earth' ideas outright and are more likely to be open to any number of natural processes, including ones involving the sun.
What is the basic idea behind Creationism?
Like evolutionism, creationism has its presuppositions. The first and most determinative is that almighty God created the universe and everything in it in the beginning. Followers of Young-earth creationism hold that this was done roughly 6000 years ago. Old-earth creationists hold that the long ages of the evolutionary time-scale can be accommodated into the Bible record in Genesis. They thus take the accounts non-literally. Young-earth creationists hold that science does not conflict with their position. They thus point to and use the same data as do other scientists but interpret it differently. Astronomer Russell Humphreys points out that there is actually, when all the evidence is considered, much more evidence for a young than an old earth. Thus a central idea in creationism is the matter of the age of the earth, with criticism of old-age views a significant part of their activity, but by no means the only one. Old-earth creationists do not have any conflict over the age of the earth, although they hold that God created all things.
