North-South Compromise! I'm 100% sure. actually its the three-foruths compromise and it said that 3 out of ever 4 slaves would be counted as one person for the population
Instead of counting all slaves for population to determine electoral votes, they only counted slaves as 3/5 of a person to calculate the electoral votes. Before this they didn't count any of the slaves as part of the population when calculating electoral votes.
i think you ask your teacher because the answers can help you find something about ur homework because home work make you smarter and go level ur grade
"Should states be represented equally or in proportion to their population? Both, according to the Connecticut compromise, states have equal representation in the senate, but representation in the house is by population. What should be done about slaver/How should slave be represented in the house of representatives? Congress was silent on this issue, besides saying they could not be imported after 1808/By counting them as 3/5 a person. Should the right to vote be based on universal manhood suffrage, or should it be very restricted? Finesse the issue. Let the states decide qualifications for voting.
The Three-Fifths Compromise this compromise ment that for every 5 slaves 3 of them would be counted for taxation and representation.
The Three-fifths Compromise was proposed by delegates James Wilson and Roger Sherman during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The three fifths clause stated that slaves counted as only three-fifths of a person.The three-fifths compromise was a strongly anti-slavery provision put into the Constitution. It was written in order to block the pro-slavery south from gaining additional representation in Congress by counting slaves as a full person for census purposes, even though the same slaves did not have the right to vote. It was added as Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3 to the United States Constitution. It is often referred to as the 3-5 clause, even though it was The Three-fifths Compromise.It was superceded and thereby rescinded or abolished by the 14th Amendment in 1868, which gave black Americans the same rights as all other citizens.
By counting 60% of slaves for the purposes of representation and taxes. All delegates to the Convention recognized that this was an imperfect compromise to a difficult issue, but many of the delegates redesigning American government didn't want to deal with slavery at all. by counting 60% for all slaves--APEX
By using the 3/5ths compromise.Only counting 3 out 5 slaves to be counted as 1.
3/5 Compromise
Instead of counting all slaves for population to determine electoral votes, they only counted slaves as 3/5 of a person to calculate the electoral votes. Before this they didn't count any of the slaves as part of the population when calculating electoral votes.
counting slaves in the population
The debate at the Constitutional Convention regarding representation occurred between small states and large states. A deal with struck with the Connecticut Compromise, which included proportional representation in the House of Representatives based on population.
The Three-Fifths Compromisewas a compromise between Southern and Northern states reached during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 in which three-fifths of the enumerated population of slaves would be counted for representation purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives. It was proposed by delegates James Wilsonand Roger Sherman.
i think you ask your teacher because the answers can help you find something about ur homework because home work make you smarter and go level ur grade
"Should states be represented equally or in proportion to their population? Both, according to the Connecticut compromise, states have equal representation in the senate, but representation in the house is by population. What should be done about slaver/How should slave be represented in the house of representatives? Congress was silent on this issue, besides saying they could not be imported after 1808/By counting them as 3/5 a person. Should the right to vote be based on universal manhood suffrage, or should it be very restricted? Finesse the issue. Let the states decide qualifications for voting.
The Great Compromise took the ideas of the Virginia Plan (large state plan) and the New Jersey Plan (small state plan) and created a two house legislature (bicameral). The Senate would be made up of equal number of senators from each state, selected by the state legislatures. The House of Representatives would be elected by the people in each district and state, and based upon population representation. The more people living in the state, the more representatives the state would have. But even small states would be equally represented with the large states in the Senate. A bill would have to be approved by both houses before it became law. And only the House (the most representative of the people) could initiate money bills.
The most serious disagreement in the debate between large and small states at the Constitutional Convention was the issue of representation. Small states feared that their voices would be lost if representatives were chosen based on population, while big states didn't think it was fair that the small states would have as much influence as they had.
The Three-Fifths Compromise this compromise ment that for every 5 slaves 3 of them would be counted for taxation and representation.