The first vote was 11-1 against Henry Fonda. So all the others changed their vote.
Twelve jurors are trying to come to a decision on whether a young man is guilty or innocent for the murder of his father.
There have always been twelve jurors on any jury panels that I know of. Does something give you the impression there should be any less? I believe twelve individuals would be able to come up with the appropriate verdict much better than six. I only say that because I realize some cases only employ six to eight jurors. But, not in Capital cases!
Juror #7 had tickets to see the Yankees play Cleveland.
Yes. He was the 6th juror to vote not guilty.
Because jurors are there to do a job and not socialize. Even the use of first names provide a platform for personalization, which could possible hinder deliberation efforts.
Twelve Angry Months was created in 2007.
Juror Eight is the protagonist in Twelve Angry Men.
The trial was disrupted by an angry outburst from one of the jurors.
In "12 Angry Men," the rain symbolizes the tension and pressure building in the jury room as the jurors deliberate the fate of the defendant. It creates an intense atmosphere that mirrors the internal conflicts and struggles experienced by the jurors.
Dramatic Publishing http://www.dramaticpublishing.com/p1602/Twelve-Angry-Men/product_info.html
This isn't really explored. 12 Angry Men makes for a better title than 12 Angry People. While making remakes, adding female jurors was explored but dismissed as executives did not want to change the title. Writing in a female might change the group dynamic and require extra work in script writing.
No, they eventually agree that the boy is innocent.