Why did the Romans reject Christianity at first?

Answer 1

At first, it seems that the Roman authorities preferred to pay no attention to the Christian Church, as long as its members did not foment unrest by overt displays of 'Atheism'. Edward Gibbon (The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire) says that the provincial governors declared themselves ready to listen to any accusation that might affect the public safety, but as soon as they were informed that it was a question not of facts but of words, a dispute relating only to the interpretation of the Jewish laws and prophecies, they deemed it unworthy of the majesty of Rome seriously to discuss the obscure differences that might arise among a barbarous and superstitious people.

By the time of Emperor Diocletian, at the end of the third century, it seemed that the Christians had constituted a distinct republic to be suppressed before it had acquired any military force. It was already governed by its own laws and magistrates, was possessed of its own public treasury and was intimately connected to all its parts by the frequent assemblies of the bishops, to whose decrees their numerous and.opulent congregations yielded an implicit obedience. The authorities were becoming worried, but more for secular than religious reasons.

Treason was becoming associated with some Christians. On the day of a public festival, Marcellus the centurion threw away his arms and the ensigns of his office, and exclaimed with a loud voice that he would obey none but Jesus Christ the eternal King, and that he renounced forever the use of carnal weapons and the service of an idolatrous master. The soldiers, as soon as they recovered from their astonishment, secured the person of Marcellus. By his own confession, he was condemned and beheaded for the crime of desertion.

Answer 2

Because both the Jews and the Romans rejected calling upon the name of Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour. Yet the Christians preached that outside of Christ all are detestable in the eyes of God.

Answer 3

There were several reasons for the Romans' mistrust of the Christians but the main reason was, as the ancient writers state, their clannishness. Roman society was a very open and social society, based upon the patron and client system which necessitated an extroverted approach to life situations. The Christians, for the most part, did not participate in the "normal" ways of Roman life and they hung together. To the Roman way of thinking, this clannishness and secret "religious" meetings could only mean trouble.

There were several reasons for the Romans' mistrust of the Christians but the main reason was, as the ancient writers state, their clannishness. Roman society was a very open and social society, based upon the patron and client system which necessitated an extroverted approach to life situations. The Christians, for the most part, did not participate in the "normal" ways of Roman life and they hung together. To the Roman way of thinking, this clannishness and secret "religious" meetings could only mean trouble.

There were several reasons for the Romans' mistrust of the Christians but the main reason was, as the ancient writers state, their clannishness. Roman society was a very open and social society, based upon the patron and client system which necessitated an extroverted approach to life situations. The Christians, for the most part, did not participate in the "normal" ways of Roman life and they hung together. To the Roman way of thinking, this clannishness and secret "religious" meetings could only mean trouble.

There were several reasons for the Romans' mistrust of the Christians but the main reason was, as the ancient writers state, their clannishness. Roman society was a very open and social society, based upon the patron and client system which necessitated an extroverted approach to life situations. The Christians, for the most part, did not participate in the "normal" ways of Roman life and they hung together. To the Roman way of thinking, this clannishness and secret "religious" meetings could only mean trouble.

There were several reasons for the Romans' mistrust of the Christians but the main reason was, as the ancient writers state, their clannishness. Roman society was a very open and social society, based upon the patron and client system which necessitated an extroverted approach to life situations. The Christians, for the most part, did not participate in the "normal" ways of Roman life and they hung together. To the Roman way of thinking, this clannishness and secret "religious" meetings could only mean trouble.

There were several reasons for the Romans' mistrust of the Christians but the main reason was, as the ancient writers state, their clannishness. Roman society was a very open and social society, based upon the patron and client system which necessitated an extroverted approach to life situations. The Christians, for the most part, did not participate in the "normal" ways of Roman life and they hung together. To the Roman way of thinking, this clannishness and secret "religious" meetings could only mean trouble.

There were several reasons for the Romans' mistrust of the Christians but the main reason was, as the ancient writers state, their clannishness. Roman society was a very open and social society, based upon the patron and client system which necessitated an extroverted approach to life situations. The Christians, for the most part, did not participate in the "normal" ways of Roman life and they hung together. To the Roman way of thinking, this clannishness and secret "religious" meetings could only mean trouble.

There were several reasons for the Romans' mistrust of the Christians but the main reason was, as the ancient writers state, their clannishness. Roman society was a very open and social society, based upon the patron and client system which necessitated an extroverted approach to life situations. The Christians, for the most part, did not participate in the "normal" ways of Roman life and they hung together. To the Roman way of thinking, this clannishness and secret "religious" meetings could only mean trouble.

There were several reasons for the Romans' mistrust of the Christians but the main reason was, as the ancient writers state, their clannishness. Roman society was a very open and social society, based upon the patron and client system which necessitated an extroverted approach to life situations. The Christians, for the most part, did not participate in the "normal" ways of Roman life and they hung together. To the Roman way of thinking, this clannishness and secret "religious" meetings could only mean trouble.

Answer 4

There were several reasons for the Romans be be suspicious of Christians and most of them stemmed from the exclusiveness or unsocialness of the Christians. The Romans were an open, social society. Most business was conducted outdoors and even the wealthy walked around and made social contacts. The Christians, however, stuck together. They were considered both antisocial because of their clannishness and a nuisance because of their aggressiveness in trying to get converts. The next step in popular thinking was that they are plotting against the state, afterall, no one who was not a Christian could take part in their religious rites. When the fire in Rome during the reign of Nero occurred and Christians were seen hindering the firefighters and running through the city carrying torches, those actions would make anyone suspicious.

There were several reasons for the Romans be be suspicious of Christians and most of them stemmed from the exclusiveness or unsocialness of the Christians. The Romans were an open, social society. Most business was conducted outdoors and even the wealthy walked around and made social contacts. The Christians, however, stuck together. They were considered both antisocial because of their clannishness and a nuisance because of their aggressiveness in trying to get converts. The next step in popular thinking was that they are plotting against the state, afterall, no one who was not a Christian could take part in their religious rites. When the fire in Rome during the reign of Nero occurred and Christians were seen hindering the firefighters and running through the city carrying torches, those actions would make anyone suspicious.

There were several reasons for the Romans be be suspicious of Christians and most of them stemmed from the exclusiveness or unsocialness of the Christians. The Romans were an open, social society. Most business was conducted outdoors and even the wealthy walked around and made social contacts. The Christians, however, stuck together. They were considered both antisocial because of their clannishness and a nuisance because of their aggressiveness in trying to get converts. The next step in popular thinking was that they are plotting against the state, afterall, no one who was not a Christian could take part in their religious rites. When the fire in Rome during the reign of Nero occurred and Christians were seen hindering the firefighters and running through the city carrying torches, those actions would make anyone suspicious.

There were several reasons for the Romans be be suspicious of Christians and most of them stemmed from the exclusiveness or unsocialness of the Christians. The Romans were an open, social society. Most business was conducted outdoors and even the wealthy walked around and made social contacts. The Christians, however, stuck together. They were considered both antisocial because of their clannishness and a nuisance because of their aggressiveness in trying to get converts. The next step in popular thinking was that they are plotting against the state, afterall, no one who was not a Christian could take part in their religious rites. When the fire in Rome during the reign of Nero occurred and Christians were seen hindering the firefighters and running through the city carrying torches, those actions would make anyone suspicious.

There were several reasons for the Romans be be suspicious of Christians and most of them stemmed from the exclusiveness or unsocialness of the Christians. The Romans were an open, social society. Most business was conducted outdoors and even the wealthy walked around and made social contacts. The Christians, however, stuck together. They were considered both antisocial because of their clannishness and a nuisance because of their aggressiveness in trying to get converts. The next step in popular thinking was that they are plotting against the state, afterall, no one who was not a Christian could take part in their religious rites. When the fire in Rome during the reign of Nero occurred and Christians were seen hindering the firefighters and running through the city carrying torches, those actions would make anyone suspicious.

There were several reasons for the Romans be be suspicious of Christians and most of them stemmed from the exclusiveness or unsocialness of the Christians. The Romans were an open, social society. Most business was conducted outdoors and even the wealthy walked around and made social contacts. The Christians, however, stuck together. They were considered both antisocial because of their clannishness and a nuisance because of their aggressiveness in trying to get converts. The next step in popular thinking was that they are plotting against the state, afterall, no one who was not a Christian could take part in their religious rites. When the fire in Rome during the reign of Nero occurred and Christians were seen hindering the firefighters and running through the city carrying torches, those actions would make anyone suspicious.

There were several reasons for the Romans be be suspicious of Christians and most of them stemmed from the exclusiveness or unsocialness of the Christians. The Romans were an open, social society. Most business was conducted outdoors and even the wealthy walked around and made social contacts. The Christians, however, stuck together. They were considered both antisocial because of their clannishness and a nuisance because of their aggressiveness in trying to get converts. The next step in popular thinking was that they are plotting against the state, afterall, no one who was not a Christian could take part in their religious rites. When the fire in Rome during the reign of Nero occurred and Christians were seen hindering the firefighters and running through the city carrying torches, those actions would make anyone suspicious.

There were several reasons for the Romans be be suspicious of Christians and most of them stemmed from the exclusiveness or unsocialness of the Christians. The Romans were an open, social society. Most business was conducted outdoors and even the wealthy walked around and made social contacts. The Christians, however, stuck together. They were considered both antisocial because of their clannishness and a nuisance because of their aggressiveness in trying to get converts. The next step in popular thinking was that they are plotting against the state, afterall, no one who was not a Christian could take part in their religious rites. When the fire in Rome during the reign of Nero occurred and Christians were seen hindering the firefighters and running through the city carrying torches, those actions would make anyone suspicious.

There were several reasons for the Romans be be suspicious of Christians and most of them stemmed from the exclusiveness or unsocialness of the Christians. The Romans were an open, social society. Most business was conducted outdoors and even the wealthy walked around and made social contacts. The Christians, however, stuck together. They were considered both antisocial because of their clannishness and a nuisance because of their aggressiveness in trying to get converts. The next step in popular thinking was that they are plotting against the state, afterall, no one who was not a Christian could take part in their religious rites. When the fire in Rome during the reign of Nero occurred and Christians were seen hindering the firefighters and running through the city carrying torches, those actions would make anyone suspicious.

Answer 5

There were several reasons for the Romans be be suspicious of Christians and most of them stemmed from the exclusiveness or unsocialness of the Christians. The Romans were an open, social society. Most business was conducted outdoors and even the wealthy walked around and made social contacts. The Christians, however, stuck together. They were considered both antisocial because of their clannishness and a nuisance because of their aggressiveness in trying to get converts. The next step in popular thinking was that they are plotting against the state, afterall, no one who was not a Christian could take part in their religious rites. When the fire in Rome during the reign of Nero occurred and Christians were seen hindering the firefighters and running through the city carrying torches, those actions would make anyone suspicious.

Answer 6

There were several reasons for the Romans' mistrust of the Christians but the main reason was, as the ancient writers state, their clannishness. Roman society was a very open and social society, based upon the patron and client system which necessitated an extroverted approach to life situations. The Christians, for the most part, did not participate in the "normal" ways of Roman life and they hung together. To the Roman way of thinking, this clannishness and secret "religious" meetings could only mean trouble.

Answer 7

Christianity was regarded as a Jewish sect at first; also, Christians refused to worship the emperor.

Answer 8

idgaf