Weapons of mass destruction have never been used against the US. In fact, the US is the only country that has ever used an atomic bomb against Another Country and that was Japan during the second World War.
there were no wpd in Afghanistan it was just a excuse used to justify the invasion
The biggest result was no weapons of mass destruction were used, like the atomic bombs used in WWII. The Korean War was a 'limited war."
When biological weapons have been used the outcome has been massive death and biological destruction. It affects all things in the area used. When Hessian used biological weapons against his people whole populations died. Since it is biological it stays in the environment and can mutate so it has been agreed not to use them.
The reason as to why the United States went to war Iraq remains contentious. The official reason given however was to remove a regime that was developing and using the weapons of mass destruction.The Initial Official Justification was that Iraq was creating Weapons of Mass DestructionThe primary reason given by the administration of George W. Bush was that Saddam Hussein, the leader of Iraq, was engaged in the production or acquisition of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). These are nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons (examples are the anthrax letter attacks in the US and the Sarin gas attacks in Tokyo--neither of which had any connection to Iraq). It was suggested that Hussein might provide these weapons to terrorists to attack the US. He had already used chemical weapons sold to him by the US against Iran, and also against Iraqi Kurds. Before the war UN inspectors announced they had found no evidence of WMDs, despite unfettered access. After the war was under way, additional investigation concluded Saddam did not have WMDs.
The US administration falsified reports claiming that satellite images pinpointed the storage location of enriched Uranium. The images were those of uranium photographed before the first gulf war but not recent ones.
There were allegations that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and considering that Iraq famously used weapons of mass destruction during the Iran-Iraq War, such an allegation was not preposterous.
normative
there were no wpd in Afghanistan it was just a excuse used to justify the invasion
The common justification is having weapons of mass destruction. Iraq was accused of having nuclear weapons that proved later to not true. Syria was accused of using chemical weapons against Syrian people although the inspection team have not yet proved whether the chemical weapons used by the government or by the opposition.
Albert Einstein refused to develop weapons of mass destruction to be used in wars. He was a pacifist and considered the murder of men as abhorrent.
Albert Einstein refused to develop weapons of mass destruction to be used in wars. He was a pacifist and considered the murder of men as abhorrent.
The biggest result was no weapons of mass destruction were used, like the atomic bombs used in WWII. The Korean War was a 'limited war."
sorry its classified they didnt make anything though a irraqi factory did but Americans were there only Americans They had no nuclear weapons
science is used dangerously when you have scientist producing weapons of mass destruction and refuse to see the other side of the coin. please read Dan Browns Angels and Demons.
Capital Punishment is used when a criminal perpetrates a heinous crime such as aggrivated murder, federal treason, espionage, terrorism, or the use of weapons of mass destruction to cause the death of human life.
the u.s. used non nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons against japan
When biological weapons have been used the outcome has been massive death and biological destruction. It affects all things in the area used. When Hessian used biological weapons against his people whole populations died. Since it is biological it stays in the environment and can mutate so it has been agreed not to use them.