0
'Nothing strengthens the judgment and quickens the conscience like individual responsibility' What does this mean?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
This means that if you are held to be responsible for something, and do not have the option of passing the blame onto someone else, you tend to think carefully about the consequences before you make decisions.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
This quote suggests that assuming responsibility for one's actions and decisions can help develop better judgment and a stronger moral compass. When individuals know they are accountable for their choices, they are more likely to think carefully and consider the consequences of their actions. Ultimately, taking personal responsibility can lead to greater self-awareness and ethical decision-making.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How ideas formed?
Ideas are formed by certain areas of the brain, such as you memory, senses, good judgment, with help from you sub-conscience mind and conscience.
What is the name given to an officer of the court charged with the responsibility of enforcing the judgment or order of the court?
The bailiff is an officer of the court charged with the responsibility of enforcing the judgment or order of the court.
What are the different type of conscience?
Conscience-The awareness of a moral or ethical aspect to one's conduct together with the urge to prefer right over wrong. Antecedent conscience- The judgment of a person deciding on a moral matter prior to acting on it. Antecedent conscience either commands or forbids, counsels or permits the performance of an act. Consequent conscience- The judgment of the mind on the morality of an action already performed. The conscience either approves what has been done, giving peace to the mind and spiritual joy, or disapproves of what was done, thus causing remorse and a sense of guilt. Right/True conscience- The mind making a correct moral judgment on some action either to be performed or already done. When the conscience is true, a person's subjective judgment corresponds to the objective fact that a particular human act is morally good or morally wrong. Erroneous/False conscience- The judgment of the mind when it wrongly decides that something is lawful but that in fact is unlawful, or vice versa. The error may be due to the false principles used or because the mind was darkened or confused in its reasoning process. Certain conscience- A state of mind when it has no prudent fear of being wrong about its judgment on some moral issue and firmly decides that some action is right or wrong. Doubtful conscience- A state of mind when it cannot certainly decide for or against a course of action and leaves the person unsure about the morality of what one is to do, or what one may have done. One sign of a doubtful conscience is that it gives rise to a positive judgment with a prudent fear of being wrong, or more commonly to a negative judgment in which the person does not know whether an act is lawful or not. Tender conscience- A conscience that forms objectively correct judgments with comparative ease even in finer distinctions between good and evil. Lax conscience- An erroneous conscience when the mind decides on insufficient grounds that a sinful act is permissible or that something gravely wrong is not serious. Source:http://www.catholicculture.org/index.cfm
What is refers to a set of moral inhibitions?
Conscience refers to a set of moral inhibitions that guide an individual's behavior and judgment about right and wrong. It is the internal sense of what is morally right or wrong, based on one's values, beliefs, and sense of duty.
What brain area associates experiences necessary for the production of abstract ideas judgment and conscience?
Prefrontal area
What is antecedent conscience?
antecedent conscience is a judgment passed "before" the action is done. It is the voice within our inner self that tells us: "Yes,do it"or "No,don't do it".. BEFORE we are going to take the action..
If the Pope is wrong and Catholics commit mortal sin because of this does the Pope carry the full sin for this or does the individual have to carry the sin for this?
Catholic AnswerA person is liable before God for all his actions. He must always act according to his conscience, if he goes against his conscience he is sinning - even if his conscience is wrong. Of course, if his conscience is wrong, then he is sinning by not informing his conscience correctly. That is everybody's individual responsibile - to correctly inform his conscience (to educate it) and to follow it. The Pope must follow that as well. You have two questions here, one is what is a person's responsibility, and the other is what is the Holy Father's responsibility. You needn't worry about that second as that is between the Holy Father and God. You are only responsible for your own actions.There was an interesting discussion of this in Faith Facts Answers to Catholic Questions by Leon J. Suprenant, Jr. & Philip C.L. Gray, which discusses what should one do if one is asked to stand during the Eucharistic Prayer by a priest when you know that the Church tells us we are to kneel. The priest, in this case is wrong, and we should kneel. However, to commit scandal is a sin, and if by disobeying the priest we cause another to sin through scandal, then we are committing sin which may be mortal. In this particular case I would not think it would be mortal as the conditions are not all met.In the case of the Holy Father. You have two different sets of teachings. When the Holy Father is teaching ex cathedra, then he is infallible. In this case you need not worry as to whether he is wrong or not, as we know that he can not be wrong. If he is not teaching ex cathedra, then you are still obliged to form your own conscience correctly and abide by that, not his opinion.from The Catechism of the Catholic Church, second edition, English translation 19941783 Conscience must be informed and moral judgment enlightened. A well-formed conscience is upright and truthful. It formulates its judgments according to reason, in conformity with the true good willed by the wisdom of the Creator. The education of conscience is indispensable for human beings who are subjected to negative influences and tempted by sin to prefer their own judgment and to reject authoritative teachings.1790 A human being must always obey the certain judgment of his conscience. If he were deliberately to act against it, he would condemn himself. Yet it can happen that moral conscience remains in ignorance and makes erroneous judgments about acts to be performed or committed.
What is arbitrary exercise?
It is subject to individual will or judgment without restriction.
Why does Nietzsche deny that human conscience emerge in the criminal?
Nietzsche believed that human conscience, or moral judgment, does not necessarily arise from a sense of guilt or wrongdoing as seen in criminals. Rather, he argued that conscience is shaped by societal values, beliefs, and power dynamics. Therefore, he rejects the idea that criminals have a different or lack of conscience, but rather that their actions may stem from a different set of values or circumstances.
What are the levels of conscience?
there are three levels of conscience based on our book, the fear conscience, moral/ethical conscience and the christian religious conscience. The titles speak of itself. fear conscience because of the fear of being punished. moral conscience is more on the values. Christian religious is more on what God wants you to do.
Is a judgment against the person or property?
A judgment can be against either the person or their property. A personal judgment is against the individual's assets or income, while a lien on property is against the person's property.
What is the example of antecedent conscience?
Antecedent conscience occurs when judgment is placed before an act is committed. An example of this would be the conscience saying this is wrong, don't do it as a person is about to commit a crime.
