The black footed ferret captive breeding program has produced many kits; however, problems associated with inbreeding may develop. There are only 7 genetic founders represented in the breeding pool. Genetic analysis initially recommended maintaining 200 breeding animals in captivity to maintain 80% of the genetic diversity of founders for over 200 years (Ballou & Oakleaf 1989); this was later increased to 240 adults. To increase the productive capacity of breeding animals, captive management strives to maintain a ratio of 3 males:5 females. Emphasis is placed on genetic management of the captive population because of the comparative ease of managing its genetics relative to wild populations (Russell et al. 1994), and because mortality of reintroduced animals is high. Therefore, only genetically "surplus" animals (i.e., high inbreeding coefficients and high representation in the captive population) and numbers produced in excess of those needed to replace loss of captive animals are available for reintroduction (Godbey & Biggins 1994). Genetic studies to determine relatedness of "founders" were called for in 1985 but never conducted and ferret lineages remain estimates based on the locations of animals captured from the wild. In addition, animals of disputed paternity entered the breeding population in 1987-88. As a result, genetic management has been compromised.
Source: Umich.edu/~esupdate/library/96.10-11/reading
Survival. They never died out. Modern Europeans are descended from the Cro-Magnon.
averge survival has improved to age 50
the guards.
A particular phenotype influences adaptation according to whether the phenotype improves the survival of the organism, or whether it is detrimental to the survival of the organism.
Be careful with this, it is usually misinterpreted as survival of fittest individuals. Instead it is survival of fittest population via death of some individuals early. Individuals never evolve, they are fixed genetic snapshots in the movie of life, they simply live or die. Populations evolve.
1. Production of more individuals than the environment can support will lead to a struggle among the individuals in a population resulting in the survival of a few. 2. Survival of the individuals will depend on inherited traits that will enhance their survival and reproduction. Those with traits that increase the probability of surviving will have a higher rate of survival and are likely to have more offspring than those who are less fit. 3. The ability of individuals to adapt to the environment will lead to a gradual change of the population retaining characteristics that accrue over generations source: Biology by Campbell and Reece
No. Because ' survival of the fittest ' is a highly inaccurate concept that is not considered empirically supportable. Fit individuals die; populations evolve by expressing the traits passed on by fit individuals. That fitness is environmentally in context dependent and a phrase like ' survival of the fittest ', while catchy, does not address the true issue of heredity.
IN the case of a HUMAN community, more money earned and higher quality of life the higher the survival rates for the occupants of that particular community.
Individuals with intraocular retinoblastoma who do not have trilateral retinoblastoma usually have a good survival rate with a 90% chance of disease-free survival for five years.
In order to secure the and survival rate of next generation of that particular plant.
Natural Selection.
Natural selection