Your question is almost an invitation for humorous remarks on red hair, short tempers and the intake of Alcoholic Beverages. But historically speaking, the Vikings were by far the most successful, having conquered and settled big parts of France, England , Ireland and Sicily and having successfully raided almost all other parts of Western Europe. They moreover provided the Emperors of Byzantium with their elite fighters for over a hundred years. The Irish mostly fought the English, unfortunately for them usually without much success.
2. In Europe, the U.S. was fighting more than one country and had more Allies that they could rely on.
It means that they were great out in the field fighting batles. but when it came to looking after the organisation of their newly conquered land they were not very good.
The Japanese Navy figured it was better for the battleship Yamato to go down fighting; rather than being ingloriously sunk at her moorings.
six months
the tank, the flamethrower, and they "upgraded" the hand grenades. they also introduced the atomic bombs (hiroshimaa and nagasaki)
Harevey Greatrex
no, that is not true they are a great team and they are way better than the packers because they have a better runningback and Jared Allen on the vikings always sacks Aaron rogers
yes. because potatoes.
Both the Vikings and Lions were 6-10 this year (2010). The Lions did have a better divisional record than that of the Vikings so they technically would finish higher than them in the standings.
at crime fighting yes
Vikings beat packers twice!!!!!!
broadly the Irish and some viking allies versus the vikings of dublin and allied vikings from isle of man England etc. Irish led by brian boru, high king of Ireland. Irish victory but boru was killed by a retreating viking (legend says while praying in his tent). the culprit was caught and put to a gruesome . Why the battle? the usual struggle for power and influence. normally seen as Irish versus viking but a bit more complicated than that. vikings remained peacefully in Ireland but did not dominate politically or militarily.
The Celts were alot better fighters than the british seeing as britsin is a community of mixed races... The Irish Never gave up on defending their land, England just bribed people to invade countries for them and joined other groups and called them british... And the Irish have been known to be quite rough. And a more exciting society.
For the moment the Vikings are the better team based on their 12-4 record vs. Pittsburgh's 9-7 and Minnesota's deep playoff run in 2009. This of course can change in 2010.
it depends on what you want to do. for hunting and for a great all rounder than i would say a Irish hunter. but a friesians have lovely paces and are great at dressage.
the packers are better because they have won 3 super bowls, including the very first super bowl ever!! Obviously Aaron Rodgers is better
because Irish have better things to do than just sit there and HOPE to catch a fish like..... drink beer and liqor