0
Are recorded observations and scientific results the same thing?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
yes
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
A scientific law an explanation of things or events based on observations of an explariment?
Is a scientific law an explaination of thing or events based on observations of an explariment
What is a general rule being suggested after a series of observations that all point to the same thing?
This comes from the scientific method. A hypothesis is a rational explanation for an observed phenomena. When multiple researchers confirm the observations in agreement with the hypothesis, the explanation of the set of observations can be referred to as a theory.
Explain how peer review affects scientific knowledge?
to claim you have tested something scientifically is one thing but to have others scrutinise your tests and results is a peer review.
What is A method of solving scientific problems based mostly on observations?
Scientific method is used for solving problems with a step by step procedure. First Observation is needed to describe a certain experience then; youâ??ll now create your hypothesis to point out an idea why did it happen next thing to do is to use hypothesis to anticipate things that can lead to having new observations, last is to perform experiments or tests in order to know more about the phenomena happened.
What do scientist do after the hypothesis?
The first step in a scientific investigation is to ask a question. The second step is to gather information or conduct research. The third step is to make a hypothesis. The fourth step is to test the hypothesis. The fifth step is gather results and declare a conclusion.
A scientific law an explanation of things or events based on observations of an explariment?
Is a scientific law an explaination of thing or events based on observations of an explariment
What is a general rule being suggested after a series of observations that all point to the same thing?
This comes from the scientific method. A hypothesis is a rational explanation for an observed phenomena. When multiple researchers confirm the observations in agreement with the hypothesis, the explanation of the set of observations can be referred to as a theory.
How does a theory differ in a science setting from a theory in a non-science setting?
If a theory is scientific it is an idea which has been formed by certain clearly understood processes. There has to be observations. That means the idea must have arisen from some real thing or happening which people can watch and measure. The observations have to be measured. The results of the measurements have to be attributed in a logical manner to whatever caused those particular results . By "logical manner" we mean occurrences which are within the rules of physics, chemistry, mathematics and the other scientific knowledge. No magical occurrences are allowed and no occurrences which cannot be explained by other accepted scientific theories. Any idea which has not been arrived at by those processes is a "non-scientific" theory.
Studying the effect of one thing on anothher in order to test a hypothesis is a?
An organized process for gathering observations is the scientific method. The scientific method consists of steps that help researchers get accurate information about research.
Why must the results of a scientific investigation be repeatable before they are accepted as true by all scientist?
Because the proof lies in doing the thing. If you cant do it again then there is no proof.
Explain how peer review affects scientific knowledge?
to claim you have tested something scientifically is one thing but to have others scrutinise your tests and results is a peer review.
Is hiking up a mountain scientific?
No. Just pleasure! Certain scientists may hike up the mountain to carry out particular observations or studies, but simply hiking up the thing is just for recreation - and very worthwhile at that.
Are data and results the same thing?
Generally, data and results are considered the same thing.
What is A method of solving scientific problems based mostly on observations?
Scientific method is used for solving problems with a step by step procedure. First Observation is needed to describe a certain experience then; youâ??ll now create your hypothesis to point out an idea why did it happen next thing to do is to use hypothesis to anticipate things that can lead to having new observations, last is to perform experiments or tests in order to know more about the phenomena happened.
What is the first thing that must be done in order to solve a problem?
Generally speaking, there is a "scientific process" that is followed. A general version of the "scientific process" is as follows: Ask a question, form a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, draw a conclusion, report results.
What do scientist do after the hypothesis?
The first step in a scientific investigation is to ask a question. The second step is to gather information or conduct research. The third step is to make a hypothesis. The fourth step is to test the hypothesis. The fifth step is gather results and declare a conclusion.
What does it mean to make observations?
It means to observe or conclude some thing about your experiment.
