There are arguments against vegetarianism but they are ill- informed and uneducated. Arguments against vegetarianism include:
These arguments, as mentioned, do not stand up.
A proper vegetarian diet is lean and provides all the protein, minerals, and vitamins a person needs while affording a great deal of diversity in food sources. A person can easily live a full, happy, and complete dietary life without any meat because the nutrients and proteins provided by meat are available in legions of plant-based alternatives.
Unfortunately, many vegetarians, like many meat-eaters, lean toward eating lots of sweets, breads, unhealthy snacks, beverages, carbohydrates, and fats because these foods can be grabbed on the go. As a result, a vegetarian who eats the wrong things will gain weight just like someone who eats meat.
No eating any kind of non-veg or living being material is strongly against the code of conduct of Hindu cultur and is completely prohibited in any circumstances. Again that is not true. Half the hindus are not prohibited from non-vegetarian food. The warrior clans relish non-vegetarian food and so do many others. Those who are allowed to have non-vegetarian food have no restriction against pork.
Vegetarian is where you do not eat any meat or seafood. Some people do not eat garlic or onion. vegetarian can be a choice or religion. Being is a vegetarian is good as most of the sickness and virus comes from the meats bacteria
I can't see any arguments against it. It seems correct to me.
You can be a vegetarian at any age.
Eating any animal is not vegetarian.
Knorr does have vegetarian products!
How does one prepare for any PhD interview? Know your subject. Know the scholarship on the subject. Understand your thesis and the arguments for it. Anticipate the arguments against your thesis and prepare counter-arguments.
Some are, but you can have samosas with any filling. Vegetarian samosas are.
There are many websites available that have recipes for vegetarian low gi diet foods. Amazon also sells a books, one being called The New Glucose Revolution Low GI Vegetarian Cookbooks.
i think that the arguments on for are: less people in different adoption homes and so everyone has a chance to have a child. i think the aregument for against are: that it isn't fair for the child, because the mother isn't the birth mother and if they want a child why don't they try for one
Every argument against evolution falls into several categories. 1.) It could disprove something if it were true, but that something would not be evolution. 2.) There are no arguments for Intelligent design, all they have are arguments against evolution (and sometime plate tectonics, cosmology, mathematics's, or oceanography). 3.) Every single argument made against evolution or any other natural science in defence of intelligent design (also known as creationism as determined by a conservative Christian judge) has been used as an argument against intelligent design and backing up the science that the creationists are trying to ignore. Summary: Take any creationist claim, summarize it, and take the reverse of that and you get the scientific arguments against intelligent design and for evolution.
There is no risk involved with puberty when you are a vegetarian.