0
Yes, hate speech laws are apart of the First Amendment of the US Constitution. The amendment prohibits the regulation of speech even hate speech.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did Martin Luther King Jr fight against unfair laws?
he did a speech
How effective are Hate Speech Laws?
All sorts of speech are outlawed besides so-called 'hate speech'. For example perjury, defamation, incitement to riot, incitement to crime, swearing on children's television and the like. If it is to be argued that passing laws against certain speech drives that speech underground and foments civil disobedience then we should not prosecute these either and it follows the we should thus allow citizens to lie in court, defame people, incite crime and so on. Humour doesn't usually constitute hate speech and nor does robust criticism of certain behaviours, such as risk taking. If however, hate speech laws start to become trivialised through vexatious application and arbitrary prosecution then we shouldn't throw the baby out with the bath water thereby legalising the use of racist and homophobic invective, but should instead curtail frivolous, vexatious and arbitrary situations in the first place. Unless you ar a gay person or a Jew, you don't know the full personal impact of hearing public speakers calling for the genocide of your kind, however wittily, and the drastic decisions that may connote in terms changing where you live and where to send your children to school.
Who were victims of hate in Mississippi?
how were Jim crow laws enforced and what were they against and in what particular states were more strict
Laws designed to stop violence against African Americans were called the?
Black Codes
When a newspaper writes a religious story about a celebrity that is a known lie what freedom may be restricted?
If a newspaper knowingly publishes false information about a celebrity's religious beliefs, it could be accused of defamation or libel, which could restrict their freedom of speech. Additionally, if the false information incites hate or discrimination against the celebrity based on their religion, it may be considered hate speech and not protected under freedom of speech laws.
Is the term anchor baby hate speech?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Words are just words, they are neither hate nor are they benign. It is how they are used that makes them hateful. It would depend on how you used the phrase "Anchor Baby" that would determine if it is or is not hate speech. You would have to look at your local/state laws to see what, when, where, and how hate speech is defined.
Are there laws of politics?
there are both laws and regulations at the governmental and political party level so...yes
When has the US Supreme Court upheld laws against seditious speech?
Seditious speech is that which is anti-government and is treasonous. The Constitution protects free speech no matter the subject, unless the speech is meant to incite violence or overthrow of the government.
Does the first amendment allow complete freedom of speech?
No, we have limited freedom of speech. This was discussed by the Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes who likened the limits on free speech to the yelling of "Fire" in a crowded theater when there was no fire. A citizen must responsibly limit his use of free speech to avoid endangering the innocent. Answer #2 In the PC world of today, there may be limitations on "hate speech" and there are laws against "inciting riots", etc. You also have to be careful of liable or slander.
How effective are those Hate speech laws in countries like Canada and should The U.S. federal government adopt it to their First Amendment of the US Constitution?
There are two questions here:(1) How effective are Hate Speech Laws (such as those in Canada or some European Countries)?It depends entirely on how you define "effective".If your goal is to stifle speech or force racist and discriminatory people to hide their views in public, then, sure, hate speech laws are effective. If your goal is to actually minimize racism and improve societal discourse, then these laws actually have the reverse effect. When people feel that they cannot express their opinions through legitimate avenues, they become more radical and adversarial in their beliefs. It creates greater societal disunity and friction between groups.Additionally, hate speech is entirely up to the definition of the "persecuted". Given the incredibly extensive set of words and concepts that are viewed as hateful under the increasing ambit of political correctness, hate speech laws can serve to bar speech that is simply critical or questioning of the current left-wing worldview. It sets up the dangerous idea of using the law to bar the political opposition in a democracy.(2) Is it legally permissible to have Hate Speech Laws given the First Amendment to the US Constitution?No. The First Amendment, as currently understood, has extensive protections for free speech. The bans on speech only apply in cases where direct harm will result from the speech uttered, such as words that target a particular person for murder or words that will create pandemonium and result in deaths and injuries that way. Simply uttering hateful remarks with no intent to engender physical harm is protected. Additionally, words that anger a person to the point where they consider attacking the speaker (as opposed to a person listening to the speaker attacking a third party that the speaker argues should be attacked) is also protected speech.While it is illegal to ban hate speech, it is certainly legal to perform social acts of discrimination against those who say hateful and discriminatory things. Only the government is forbidden from restricting speech, not private individuals or corporations. For example, it is permissible to reprimand or fire an employee for hateful speech. Whether or not private censorship is desirable is a decision that each person needs to make on his own.
What do husbands hate to do?
Husbands traditionally hate to interact with their in-laws.
Which US states do not have hate speech laws?
There is no federal law in the US that directly prohibits hate speech; it is protected under the First Amendment. However, some states have laws pertaining to hate crimes, which address acts motivated by bias. States without specific hate speech laws include Delaware, Nebraska, and Wyoming.
