No. Western and English horses are trained to do two different things. I've ridden both styles and the horses are just trained differently to a point. Most western riders use curb bits that add more pressure to a horses mouth if the reins are pulled on. To avoid hurting the mouth they ride with a loose rein and usually teach a horse to neck rein. English riders typically use some form of snaffle bit and prefer to keep their horses in a more collected frame. But many English riders also teach their horses to neck rein.
It all depends on the horse, and how he's been trained. Some QH's are better with the English saddle, others better with the Western saddle. Most QH's are trained to accept the Western saddle, though many other horses have been trained to accept both or either or. So it ultimately depends on both the horse, the rider and the trainer.
It depends if you trained them or not. The better they are trained, the better they will be. I would say Classical.
It depends on it GP and how much you trained. It also depends on the black market items you put on the horse. I would say western if you trained the horse really good.
The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.
Neither one is inherently better. It all depends on which language was used when they were trained.
They are better for english becase of their size and agility.
To me i think the western hog nose snake is better because it is smarter,the corn snake is better for beginners
Western. I've been riding quite a bit and i think English on ponies is for people more advanced in riding. Then for new comers.
The England army were better trained because the colonies army were a bunch of farmers.
It basically teaches you leadership because you are being trained to be an officer in the US Military.... you are being trained to LEAD US soldiers
The minutemen had an advantage because of better leadership,and they were also better trained for the type of warfare they would be dealing with.
Because i understand english better