If you held the account in name either solely or jointly and used the credit available you are still responsible for the debt, the error of the SSN is irrelevant.
Credit histories are maintained by the 3 Main credit bureaus "Transunion, Equifax and experian, your husband will need to contact them in writing after him getting an SSN card from the social security Administration, he has to contact them saying that he received an SSN card and he's no longer going to be using the ITIN number for any credit history purposes and that way he can have his credit file transfered over to the social security number he was given. All addresses are on the company's web-sites and the same thing should also be done with the IRS so they know that he won't be liable for any taxes under his old ITIN number and that he's now using a Social Number instead. hope this helps
NO
you are still liable to pay what you owe
Yes, you are liable for your husbands credit card.
It depends on the credit card application and the structure of the company. Most credit cards issued to a small business are guaranteed by the owner. In that case, you must pay. If the card was issued soley to the company, the credit card company could sue your corporation to recover any assets available. If the company was a sole proprietorship or a partnership, you are liable.
Yes - if you used the company credit card, you are liable to repay the amount you spent ! The employer can recover that directly from your wages.
ia an additional credit card holder liable for the whole debt of the credit card account
You should not have your credit card information on your 'phone. If your 'phone is stolen or lost you are open to fraud. The credit card company can hold you liable for negligence and will not make reparations.
your company got you to sign an authorisation form when you took your company credit card. This form contains a joint and several liability clause. This clause means that if your company does not pay their credit card bill then you will be liable for it. Is this unfair? Yes. You should categorically refuse to sign one of these/
Being bonded means the company has secured insurance that protects against theft or other losses caused by its employees. The financial responsibility would typically fall on the insurance company providing the bond coverage, not directly on the security guard company. The bond ensures there are funds available to compensate for any covered losses.
You are completely liable. That's the point of the personal guarantee. When you agreed to that you destroyed the concept of a corporate shield and are completely liable for the debt.
downstream liability is one of threats to the information security which mean that : if a company A's ,company its name A,information system is compromised by perpetrator ,attacker, and used to attack company B's ,company its name B, then a company A can be liable for damage to company B . the company B is "downstream"company in this attack scenario . that put A's security and operation on trial . done by Maad Sameer