yes. but they will first let you know that you can be tested at any time randomlly;
yes a company has the right to preform a drug test at anytime to any random person.
Sure. Everything on paper and signed though. In most cases a "drug-free workplace" requires potential employees to sign an agreement prior to hire to submit for drug testing upon request. This agreement or other company policy often establishes refusal to submit to test as grounds for the same action as a drug-postive test result. Laws will vary from country to country and state to state as to adequate grounds for termination.
The company should not be allowed to drug test you if they have no written drug poliocy. The only way you could keep your job if the don't want to keep you on after failing a drug test is if you are a contracted employee as opossed to an at will.
thrifty food and drug store
Some may and others may not. It depends on the company. To find out if a particular warehouse job requires a drug test, you might want to ask an employee.
Must conduct a "reasonable suspicion" drug or alcohol test.
Yes. If you list any doctor prescribed prescriptions on the drug test you won't be held responsible FOR THEM. If you've been prescribed any narcotic pain medication you might need to show the prescription to the drug testing company. Absolutely, yes. I am not an attorney but I do not believe worker's compensation status has any bearing on drug testing policies. Employment is usually an "AT WILL" agreement, meaning the employer can change their policies anytime they wish and if you refuse to abide by those policies you can quit or be terminated. An employer who is a private company has the right to implement drug testing at any time. They have the right to test every employee, random employees, or employee for whom they have reasonable suspicion to test. They also have the right to terminate any employee who refuses to take a drug test when requested to do so. I have fired 1 person for refusal to test and 1 person for positive test. Both individuals attempted to get unemployment and lost. They appealed and lost again. There is no reason I can think of that being on light duty under worker's compensation would somehow make an employee ineligible for drug testing or indicate discrimination.
No
Technically it is done for safety, but, in practice, it is done because the insurance company demands it.
believe it would be grounds to check into
If the petitioner has the problem
The Himalaya Drug Company was created in 1930.