yes but only if the reason they are receiving this information is because they are transferring this patient to that other docter
Added: . . . OR . . . the person is a patient of BOTH doctors and they are consulting (e.g.: a medical specialist - a Radiologist - a Surgeon - etc). There are any number of reasons for doctors to legitimately consult and exchange information with one another about a patient. However, if they are jsut sitting at the country club and trading stories about odd patients - no. That is not allowed wither by the medicalprofession code of ethics, OR HIPAA.
No, this would be a violation of that patient's privacy and in the US a HIPA Act violation.
Because patients of legal age and who is mentally competent have the right to refuse any procedure! If you were to preform a procedure without the patients consent or the patients guardians consent, you could be charged with assalt and go to jail!
Per HIPPA, disclosure of medical information must be secure and controlled. In this case, if the Doctor is a resident of the hospital where the patient resides, the Doctor is considered a secure and controlled release. It is under a HIPPA rule, a disclosure, but not a violation. A visiting Doctor is not allowed access to patient records without the patient consent.
Without the patient's consent the doctor wouldn't operate.
Medical records can't be released to anyone without signed consent from the patient. There are laws that protect the privacy of patients and their medical information called HIPPA.
No, because the Nurse will violate the patients right to privacy and confidentiality.
No, it is not appropriate to use a patient's telephone in their home without permission. It is essential to respect the patient's privacy and autonomy, and obtaining consent before using any personal belongings is important in maintaining ethical boundaries and professionalism in healthcare.
Some states presently allow disclosure of the following types of mental health information without patient consent: to other treatment providers, to researchers.
Battery
taking blood samples from patients for research purpose without consent
If Dr. Bob can get informed consent without jeopardizing the life of the patient then he should do so. If stopping to get consent will risk the life of the patient then he should consider the consent implied and save the life.
It is not malpractice; however it would be a violation of the Federal HIPAA law (or if not in the USA, the local equivalent patient privacy laws). HIPAA is an acronym for the Health Information Privacy Protection Act. It prohibits medical personnel from divulging certain medical information of patients to others without the patient's consent. If a physician gives out medical information without your consent, he or she would not be guilty of malpractice but would be in violation of federal law. This could subject the physician to penalties and damages - both from the government and potentially from patients if they can show harm from the disclosure. In the EU, the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC also makes it illegal for a doctor to share information without patient consent except in certain limited situations. Most other jurisdictions have similar laws.
The CPT code for family psychotherapy without the patient present is 90846. This code is used when the therapist provides services to a family unit without the individual patient being physically present during the session.