Unless the judge ask for it or the child lives in a state where he/she is old enough for a judge to listen to, the child will not be heard. It's the parents or court who decides custody and the child can not choose. If the child will be heard he/she has the right to say whatever they want.
ClarificationCourts rarely require a child to testify in a custody matter and if they do, the judge is more likely to speak with the child privately rather than have them "testify" in court. The child cannot be "called as a witness" for one party. If the judge wants to speak with the child the parent cannot refuse. In most cases the judge will order an evaluation by one or more court appointed professionals (psychologist, pediatrician, social worker, attorney, etc.) who will then submit a report of their findings and recommendations to the judge to assist her/him in rendering a decision. The judge will then, in some cases, interview the child.
No, although most courts favor custody to the mother.
It's not clear what you mean "automatic custody." The default state is for the natural parents of a child to be the custodians of that child; if the mother is not married or at least cohabitating with the father it's generally assumed that she will be the custodian. Changing that requires a deliberate legal process. If someone (for example: the child's natural father, or the child's grandparents) wants to contest it, they will have to go to court. In that case, while it's not "automatic" that the mother will win, courts do traditionally have a strong bias in favor of the natural parents (again, particularly the mother).
Generally, if one parent is found to be unfit the other parent will have sole legal and physical custody. Courts favor the biological parent in regards to custody.Generally, if one parent is found to be unfit the other parent will have sole legal and physical custody. Courts favor the biological parent in regards to custody.Generally, if one parent is found to be unfit the other parent will have sole legal and physical custody. Courts favor the biological parent in regards to custody.Generally, if one parent is found to be unfit the other parent will have sole legal and physical custody. Courts favor the biological parent in regards to custody.
cherry valence
certainly
You will need a good lawyer for this and you will have to prove he's an unfit guardian or father. The courts favor leaving the child with their biological parents(s) if possible. If you're lawyer is good and knows some previous cases he may just have the courts lean in your favor. If your ex is good to his nephew then you don't stand a chance. Marcy
No, the girl has all rights to the child and once she has the child, she can get help from the state to raise her child or put it up for adoption. A grandparent can take the girl to court and try to get custody of the child, but the courts seem to favor the natural parent unless there is abuse.
Unless the mother is somehow unfit to be the custodial parent your chances for full custody are slim. Courts favor placing children with their mother. You would have better luck requesting joint custody.
There are laws against child abuse. If your mother is actually abusing you, you could talk to a school counselor or to Child Protective Services. Assuming your other parent WANTS custody, evidence of abuse would be a very strong argument in their favor.
You stated that you have been awarded only temporary custody but you have not stated the reason. The judge may be considering that the children will be returned to their mother's custody at some point. There may be a significant difference in income levels and the mother needs the child support to maintain the residence. If you want to know the reason in your particular case you need to visit the court and ask to see your file. You can review the order and any reasoning behind it. If you still have questions about your case you can ask the court clerk to help you find answers.
The welfare of the child should be the main issue. The best parent or maybe both paremts should have custody. Who is to say that one parent is better than the other with out prove of child abuse. During custody battles, the parents are so wrapped up in themselves that the children are not actually considered. the mother has sole custody if she is not married, a father has many more rights if the child has his last name, or if he is named on the birth certificate. However, if an unmarried mother has a child who has the father's last name and she gets the child taken from her by the state, the father would actually have to file a custody petition in order to try and get custody. Nothing is automaticly in his favor there.
Not likely, courts award in parents favor meaning a court would prefer a child grow up with the parents, and unless you are rich and extremely stable a judge won't give custody of a child to a nineteen year old.