Yes, in theory. A lien is recorded assertion of an unpaid debt, so a town could sell its lien to a collection agency (if laws permit) and that agency could then foreclose on the lien by obtaining a court judgment on the debt.
However, many states frown on this and make it much easier for the town to simply auction the property itself to the public, take the proceeds in satisfaction of the debt, remove the lien, and let the new owner evict the taxpayer (or rent to the taxpayer, if preferred). A third party might have a harder time of getting the lien foreclosed.
The Prohibition Party was and is (it still exists) a single issue third political party.
No. That would mean the third party tortfeasor would pay twice, which would amount to unjust enrichment.
The Prohibition Party is (it still exists) both a third party and a single-issue party.
It depends on exactly what you mean, but if you mean repairs done by some third party, generally speaking, no. Once you buy the car at the auction and the title is in your name, you should be clear.
The plural of third party is third parties.
if the third party had permission (or implied permission) to drive (from an owner or agent of the owner) and the policy doesn't exclude them.......the owners and the driver will be held liable.....
When money or funds are in trust in an account, they are typically being held for one party and handled by another. It is a way to control and convey assets for a third-party owner.
Third party inspection companies | Third party inspection services
Your phrase is not a legal term. However, you may be referring to a situation where a property owner desires to transfer her property to herself and another as joint tenants. In Massachusetts the owner now has a statutory right to execute a deed granting the property to herself and another as joint tenants. In many other states a straw must be used. By that method title to the property is conveyed to a third party thereby severing the interest of the owner. Title to the property is immediately conveyed by that third party back to the two who desire to own the property as joint tenants.
"At risk" has to do with whether you as an owner, or part owner, of a business have any liability for money put up by a third party; it has nothing to do with the nature of that business (such as renting condo's).
A leaseback program is when a company sells an asset, usually property, to a third party and then leases that property from the current owner.
you cant unless you are using a hack or third party program