yes it can! it happens all the time yes it can! it happens all the time yes it can! it happens all the time yes it can! it happens all the time yes it can! it happens all the time yes it can! it happens all the time
Yes, an argument can have an implied premise without having an implied conclusion. The implicit or unstated premise may help support the explicitly stated premises and conclusion in the argument, even if there is no additional unstated conclusion.
Yes, arguments can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion, which is known as a deductive argument. They can also move from a general premise to a general conclusion, which is known as an inductive argument. The structure and validity of the argument depend on the relationship between the premise and conclusion.
Not necessarily. An argument is not automatically true just because the premise and conclusion are true. The reasoning connecting the premise to the conclusion must also be valid for the argument to be considered true.
An argument with a missing premise or conclusion is called an enthymeme. It is an incomplete syllogism in which one of the premises or the conclusion is left unstated.
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
A premise in an argument is a statement or proposition that serves as the basis for the conclusion of the argument. It is presented as a reason or evidence to support the conclusion that the arguer is trying to establish. Premises are essential in constructing sound and valid arguments.
Yes, arguments can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion, which is known as a deductive argument. They can also move from a general premise to a general conclusion, which is known as an inductive argument. The structure and validity of the argument depend on the relationship between the premise and conclusion.
Not necessarily. An argument is not automatically true just because the premise and conclusion are true. The reasoning connecting the premise to the conclusion must also be valid for the argument to be considered true.
An argument with a missing premise or conclusion is called an enthymeme. It is an incomplete syllogism in which one of the premises or the conclusion is left unstated.
syllogism
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
A premise in an argument is a statement or proposition that serves as the basis for the conclusion of the argument. It is presented as a reason or evidence to support the conclusion that the arguer is trying to establish. Premises are essential in constructing sound and valid arguments.
syllogism
Valid ArgumentThanks to the above answerer, I got this question wrong on my quiz.The correct answer is Valid argument.
An argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion by providing detailed evidence or examples to support the specific claim. On the other hand, an argument can move from a general premise to a general conclusion by making a broad assertion based on the general principle presented. Both forms of arguments can be effective depending on the context and the strength of the premises.
A premise has one term in common with a conclusion. A minor premise contains the minor term in the conclusion, which is the subject. It can be described as a subtle or deceptive argument or deductive reasoning.
Premise Indicators
A deductive argument with two premises is called a syllogism. In a syllogism, one premise is the major premise, another is the minor premise, and they lead to a conclusion.