Valid Argument
Thanks to the above answerer, I got this question wrong on my quiz.
The correct answer is Valid argument.
Deductive argument.
Yes, arguments can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion, which is known as a deductive argument. They can also move from a general premise to a general conclusion, which is known as an inductive argument. The structure and validity of the argument depend on the relationship between the premise and conclusion.
An argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion by providing detailed evidence or examples to support the specific claim. On the other hand, an argument can move from a general premise to a general conclusion by making a broad assertion based on the general principle presented. Both forms of arguments can be effective depending on the context and the strength of the premises.
A deductive argument starts from a general principle or premise and uses it to logically conclude a more specific statement. This type of argument moves from the general to the specific, showing how the premise leads to a certain conclusion through valid reasoning.
A deductive argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion. It involves moving from a premise that is universally accepted to a specific conclusion that logically follows from that premise.
That type of argument is known as deductive reasoning. It involves drawing a specific conclusion based on a general premise or set of premises.
An argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion by providing detailed evidence or examples to support the specific claim. On the other hand, an argument can move from a general premise to a general conclusion by making a broad assertion based on the general principle presented. Both forms of arguments can be effective depending on the context and the strength of the premises.
Yes, arguments can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion, which is known as a deductive argument. They can also move from a general premise to a general conclusion, which is known as an inductive argument. The structure and validity of the argument depend on the relationship between the premise and conclusion.
A deductive argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion. It involves moving from a premise that is universally accepted to a specific conclusion that logically follows from that premise.
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
syllogism
syllogism
An argument with a missing premise or conclusion is called an enthymeme. It is an incomplete syllogism in which one of the premises or the conclusion is left unstated.
A premise has one term in common with a conclusion. A minor premise contains the minor term in the conclusion, which is the subject. It can be described as a subtle or deceptive argument or deductive reasoning.
Premise Indicators
Premises. These are statements or propositions that provide evidence or support for a conclusion in an argument.
Conclusion indicators
The two integral components of an argument are a claim or proposition that the arguer is advocating for, and the supporting reasons or evidence given to justify that claim.