answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Prove by cases, First case is A then from A prove A v C using v Intro(A) . Case 2 is B. You will need another set of cases in Case 2, namely those of your other premise ~B (not B) v C. So case 2 (B) Will have two sub proofs. The first of the sub proofs is ~B which you prove by using _|_ Intro citing B and ~B. After this you can use _|_ Elim to prove whatever you like. Since we like or want A v C you should then add one more step and prove from _|_ A v C (using _|_ Elim). The second sub proof within case 2 should be C (this can be figured out again by looking at what you haven't used from your premises, C is the only thing you haven't used). So under C make a new line and prove A v C using v Intro. Prove _|_ for Case 2 by using vElim and then Prove A v C for your final proof by v ELim from your two cases (A B).

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Can anyone prove A v C from the premises notB v C and A v B using the Fitch Logic program?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

State the premises and conclusion what argument All students like logic Robin likes logic Robin is a student?

Premises: All students like logic. Robin likes logic. Conclusion: 3) Therefore, Robin is a student.


What is the act of drawing the wrong conclusion from two premises?

logic


Extrapolating from general premises to specific results is a kind of logic called?

Deductive reasoning


Need of program Logic controllers?

Program logic controllers are used to control the operation of most systems.


What has the author G W Fitch written?

G. W. Fitch has written: 'Naming and believing' -- subject(s): Belief and doubt, Onomasiology, Proposition (Logic), Reference (Philosophy), Semantics (Philosophy)


What are the classifications of ideas in logic?

In logic, ideas are classified as either premises or conclusions. Premises are statements that provide the foundation for an argument, while conclusions are the statements that follow logically from the premises. Additionally, ideas can be classified as true or false based on their correspondence with reality.


What is program logic?

Snarled program logic is unstructured logic, also known as "spaghetti" logic. Compiled machine code is the ultimate example of snarled program logic. Although spaghetti code is more compact and efficient than structured code, it is extremely difficult to both comprehend and maintain. Hence we use structured programming languages to provide a high level of abstraction between the logic of the programmer and the snarled logic of the machine-dependant code.


What are deductive arguments based on?

Deductive arguments are based on logical reasoning, where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. In a deductive argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This form of reasoning aims to demonstrate the validity of the conclusion through the structure of the argument.


There are no chocolate stains on your hands so you couldn't have stolen the cookies Deductive or Inductive logic?

Deductive. are the premises stated or unstated


What is the difference between a semantic error and logic error?

An error in the logic of a program means that the output of the program is faulty (eg the program tell you 2+2=5). An error in semantics in a program means that the program statements are not constructed properly and the usual result of this is that the program will not compile.


What is snarled program logic called?

Snarled program logic is unstructured logic, also known as "spaghetti" logic. Compiled machine code is the ultimate example of snarled program logic. Although spaghetti code is more compact and efficient than structured code, it is extremely difficult to both comprehend and maintain. Hence we use structured programming languages to provide a high level of abstraction between the logic of the programmer and the snarled logic of the machine-dependant code.


Assuming there are premises based on correct observations and sound logic which is more certain of resulting in a conclusion thats correct?

Deductive reasoning