Prove by cases, First case is A then from A prove A v C using v Intro(A) . Case 2 is B. You will need another set of cases in Case 2, namely those of your other premise ~B (not B) v C. So case 2 (B) Will have two sub proofs. The first of the sub proofs is ~B which you prove by using _|_ Intro citing B and ~B. After this you can use _|_ Elim to prove whatever you like. Since we like or want A v C you should then add one more step and prove from _|_ A v C (using _|_ Elim). The second sub proof within case 2 should be C (this can be figured out again by looking at what you haven't used from your premises, C is the only thing you haven't used). So under C make a new line and prove A v C using v Intro. Prove _|_ for Case 2 by using vElim and then Prove A v C for your final proof by v ELim from your two cases (A B).
Premises: All students like logic. Robin likes logic. Conclusion: 3) Therefore, Robin is a student.
logic
Deductive reasoning
Program logic controllers are used to control the operation of most systems.
G. W. Fitch has written: 'Naming and believing' -- subject(s): Belief and doubt, Onomasiology, Proposition (Logic), Reference (Philosophy), Semantics (Philosophy)
In logic, ideas are classified as either premises or conclusions. Premises are statements that provide the foundation for an argument, while conclusions are the statements that follow logically from the premises. Additionally, ideas can be classified as true or false based on their correspondence with reality.
Snarled program logic is unstructured logic, also known as "spaghetti" logic. Compiled machine code is the ultimate example of snarled program logic. Although spaghetti code is more compact and efficient than structured code, it is extremely difficult to both comprehend and maintain. Hence we use structured programming languages to provide a high level of abstraction between the logic of the programmer and the snarled logic of the machine-dependant code.
Deductive arguments are based on logical reasoning, where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. In a deductive argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This form of reasoning aims to demonstrate the validity of the conclusion through the structure of the argument.
Deductive. are the premises stated or unstated
An error in the logic of a program means that the output of the program is faulty (eg the program tell you 2+2=5). An error in semantics in a program means that the program statements are not constructed properly and the usual result of this is that the program will not compile.
Snarled program logic is unstructured logic, also known as "spaghetti" logic. Compiled machine code is the ultimate example of snarled program logic. Although spaghetti code is more compact and efficient than structured code, it is extremely difficult to both comprehend and maintain. Hence we use structured programming languages to provide a high level of abstraction between the logic of the programmer and the snarled logic of the machine-dependant code.
Deductive reasoning