0
They can both be taught in classrooms. However creationism cannot be taught as if it were scientifically verifiable fact in public schools, as it is not science, and the US Constitution prohibits federal or state funded (educational) institutions promoting religion. So if creationism is taught in public school, then it must be taught in comparative religion or philosophy classes, and not in Biology classes.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoSince Creationism is seen as promoting religion, it can be taught in courses that are not science-related. See also:
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Do you think that Evolution and Creationism should be taught in school?
Evolution is a widely accepted scientific theory supported by extensive evidence, and should be taught in science classes. Creationism, however, is based on religious beliefs and is not supported by scientific evidence, so it is not appropriate to be taught in a science classroom. It may be more suitable for discussion in courses on religion or philosophy.
Is creationism taught in Ohio public schools?
Creationism is not taught in Ohio public schools as part of the science curriculum. It may be taught in a cultural or sociological classroom setting, depending on the teacher or school. Only evolution is taught as a scientific theory for the origin of life in biology/science classes.
Why creationism shouldn't be taught in school?
Creationism can and should be taught in a sociology classroom setting, but not in a science classroom like some people want it to be. The reason for this is that creationism is not a scientific theory or even principle, it's part of cultural mythology.
What laws are there in Ohio regarding the teaching of evolution and creation in school?
In Ohio's Public School system, Evolution is taught in all science classes. "Creationism" is generally reserved for either private study, or a Religion Class. The State of Ohio does not have a law requiring this, but it is an understanding that a debate on creationism does not belong in a Science classroom, but rather a Theology classroom.
Should evolution and creationism be taught side by side in school?
Most certainly not side-by-side. That would imply that they are equivalent notions. Evolution, however, is a scientific theory, and creationism is religious myth. Evolution belongs in biology classes, creationism in something like comparative religion courses.
Why is creationism not taught in schools?
Creationism is not typically taught in schools because it is considered a religious belief rather than a scientific theory. In public schools in the United States, teaching creationism alongside evolution would violate the separation of church and state. Additionally, the scientific community widely accepts evolution as a fundamental concept in biology while creationism lacks empirical evidence and is based on faith.
How should evolution and creationism be taught in schools?
Evolution should be taught in science classes as the scientific consensus, supported by evidence from multiple scientific disciplines. Creationism, as a religious belief, can be addressed in theology or philosophy classes, or as part of discussions on cultural diversity and belief systems. It is essential to maintain the separation of science and religion in the education system.
How come creationism isn't taught in public schools?
Creationism is typically not taught in public schools because it is considered a religious belief rather than a scientific theory. Public schools aim to teach science based on evidence and the scientific method, which includes the theory of evolution as the foundation of biology education. Teaching creationism in public schools can be seen as promoting a specific religious viewpoint, which goes against the separation of church and state principle in the United States.
When was creationism taught in public schools?
Biblical creation was taught as fact in United States public schools until the latter part of the nineteenth century, because it was simply assumed that the Bible explained what really happened. From the late nineteenth century until the 1920s, the Theory of Evolution was accepted in the United States more or less without comment, and slowly began to be taught in schools. Then, in the early 1920s, a number of southern state legislatures began to pass legislation banning the teaching of evolution in public schools. It was the Tennessee law that was challenged in the infamous Scopes Trial of 1921, leading to creationism being withdrawn from public school science curriculums.The teaching of creationism having been found to be unconstitutional, attempts were then made over the following decades to have creationism taught alongside evolution, to rebadge creationism as 'science' in order to satisfy constitutional requirements, and to place stickers in science textbooks, to undermine acceptance of evolution and draw attention to creationism. All these attempts appear to have failed.For more information on the creationism debate, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What is Mitt Romney's view on teaching evolution?
Mitt Romney believes that God created the universe, and evolution is the mechanism He used to create humans. Romney believes that science classes should have evolution taught, not creationism or intelligent design. He states that they are perfectly fine in a philosophy, religion, or history classroom. This is his view from 2008. It seems that he has been relatively quiet on this issue since he started running for the Republican nomination.
Why should creationism not be taught in school?
Creationism is based on religious beliefs and is not supported by scientific evidence. Teaching creationism in schools violates the separation of church and state mandated by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Science classes should focus on teaching scientifically supported theories like evolution to ensure students receive a comprehensive and accurate education.
Does Palin believe in evolution?
she says that its nessesary to know about creationism along with evolution
