Judicial review is the power of the judiciary branch to invalidate laws made by the legislative and/or executive branch. It's generally explicitly granted by a provision in the country's constitution. It's possible to write a constitution which does not grant the judiciary branch this power, but doing so eliminates part of the "checks and balances" that are common in constitutional governments. If you mean discretionary review (review of the results of a case in a lower court), at least in the US the Supreme Court is not required to hear all appeals; those wishing to appeal to the Court submit a petition, and a certain number of Justices (at least four) must agree that the case merits a hearing. Only about 1% of the petitions are actually granted certiorari.
A judicial review is a judicial body empowered to annul lower courts rulings if they conflict with the constitution. A judicial review, for instance, might rule that a state can not decree that everyone with blue eyes be imprisoned because this conflicts with federally granted rights.
In Federalist Paper no. 78, Hamilton argues in support of judicial review.
Judicial Review.
Judicial review is primarily a check on the Legislative Branch; however, it can also be used to nullify executive orders, so it is sometimes a check on the Executive Branch.
The principle of judicial review.
A judicial review is a judicial body empowered to annul lower courts rulings if they conflict with the constitution. A judicial review, for instance, might rule that a state can not decree that everyone with blue eyes be imprisoned because this conflicts with federally granted rights.
Not quite enough info to answer the question. Did you file a REQUEST for a Judicial Review, or have you been notified that the Judicial Review was granted? In the first case; you should receive a notice of a hearing in which you will present your reasons for requesting the review, after which youj will be notified if the judge agrees with your request, or not. In the second case: you will be notified of the results of the review, and you need not do anything until that occurs.
judicial review
The power of judicial review was never formally delegated either by the Constitution or an Act of Congress, but arose from British common law practices the US Courts adopted as a matter of course. Chief Justice John Marshall formally claimed the right of judicial review in his opinion for the Marbury v. Madison, (1803) case.Case CitationMarbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
I do not know who said that but if you are wondering what it refers to, that would be a judicial review.
Judicial Review
That power is the power of judicial review.
Judicial review... which was given binding authority by Maybury v Madison in 1803
judicial review
A judicial review allows the Supreme Court to annul any acts of the state that is deemed to be unconstitutional. This decision was made during the Marbury v. Madison case which stated that they have the right to review the acts of Congress to determine its constitutionality.
no the power of judicial review is not mentioned in the constitution. because Judicial Review was used in 13th century law but the courts didn't agree with it so it was forgotten. until the case of Marbury v. Madison that is when Judicial Review came back to the power of the Supreme Court.
"Constitution review" most likely refers to the courts' power of judicial review. For more information about judicial review, see Related Questions, below.