Absolutely. More than one nation can have a military post in a foreign country, as well. E.g., Kyrgystan for a while hosted both airbases for both the United States and Russia. During the partition of Germany, the United States, France, and United Kingdom all had military posts in the former West Germany, etc.
Yes Fort Knox is a U.S. Army post and the home of the United States Bullion Depository and the US Army Armor School. Security there is so tight, it probably has more guards than an army base does.
No you don't have to be in the Army to join the Army Corps of Engineers. There are civilians who are very dedicated and deliver engineering services to more than 130 country's worldwide.
Pakistan is more stronger than france,pakistan has a well trained army
because of his great defence towards other army's, and his sacrifice to his country.
No, no army has more ships than its navy.
because their country has too many people in it and they want a really strong army
Yes and No
The United States has the best army hands down because they have been here longer than their country, they have more advanced training and units than any other force on this world and they get the best things before anyone has heard of it.
larger and more effective than the U.S army
To ask why an army is needed in war, is somewhat like asking why a team is needed to play football. Wars are fought with armies. If you don't have an army, then any other country can invade your country without any meaningful opposition. Armies are much more heavily armed than police officers.
Monaco! Monaco!
ARMY has more power than police always i support for indian army