As far as is currently known it has not yet happened, but it is theoretically possible. If the genetic material from the egg of one woman is placed in a man's sperm cell after removing the original male genetic material, then that sperm cell might be used to fertilize the egg of the other woman. It is not yet known with certainty whether or not this technology will work. To say the least there would be a storm of outrage and protest world wide over this. This would always result in female offspring since both women contribute an X. This would be less troublesome than the male-male alternative. In a male-male union both male and female offspring are possible, but the YY combination is also possible and would probably not result in normal and healthy offspring. This is different from the XYY trisomy that sometimes happens in normally conceived human males, at a rate of about 1 per thousand. In today's world these unions would surely be considered wrong by many, many people. Given the depth and growth of our scientific knowledge, and the trends in social justice and equal rights, these unions may be commonplace in future generations.
No, and you should be more carefull What do you mean that I should be more careful? I'm not talking about me in the question... i was just curious. I'm 13 years old! :(
The term biological clock usually refers to the time when women are fertile. When the biological clock says that time is over, they go through menopause and become infertile.
Mixed, molato.
7
The parents have normal sex chromosome genotypes, XX and XY. The chromosomal error that causes Klinefelter's syndrome occurs during the formation of either of the parent's gametes during meiosis.
child
No. She is an only child having been raised by her Aunt in Connecticut after the death of her parents. Her parents died in the Boston Molasses Disaster. Her parents are registered as the first women to be Gay Married and her biological father is rumored to be Julius Erving or "Dr. J" as her mothers and "Dr. J" traveled together during the dust bowl.
You were born of a woman, the one who carried you through gestation. You may be the biological child of that woman or of another woman. It could be argued that either is your mother. Additionally, in marriages or permanent relationships between two women, if they have a child, the child could be said to have two mothers. And it is possible that either or neither(!) woman carried or is a biological parent of the child. Only that they are legally adoptive parents.
Yes, say if the woman had the child then married your dad, no, but if the boys biological father is your biological father, you are related
To clarify, if you mean a woman has had an affair and become pregnant? If this is the case, and the husband is aware of it, he can order a paternity test to determine if the child is his or not. If it is not, as far as I know, the woman can go after the man who fathered the child for financial support. Support obligations only belong to the actual biological father OR a father who has legally adopted a child. There is a whole moral issue though - if the parents are staying together, does the husband want to alienate this child by not supporting it and how would he live in the same house and not support it? So really it depends on if the couple stays together. If they don't, the husband has NO obligation to support the child.
Assuming he is the biological father there should be no problem.
No. A godparent is chosen by the parents to guide the child through religion. This has nothing to do with law. There are no legal rights given to agodparent A godparent could be anyone... a teenager, a prisoner, a child abuser, etc..... not necessarily a great parental figure.
It's part of the time parents and children spend together. Try playing with your child's nipples, or asking your child to play with your nipples while you're singing together. :)David C Wesson. :)
Women have the same obligation to support their children as men if the child does not reside with them. Parents are responsible for the financial support of their children. For example, the child may reside with the biological father or another relative. In that case, the mother would be responsible for paying child support if the court entered a child support order.
No, the child's status would be based upon the parents discretion. There have been times when a women will go to Mexico for certain reasons while she's pregnant, but with no intentions on giving birth there and then the women inadvertently does give birth there. The government can not force the child to stay there when the parents are not even citzens of the country. The child would be granted dual citizenship and/or upon the parents discretion giving the citzenship of the country they live in.
There isn't a proper name for that, however a man with a dead wife is called a widower and a women with a dead husband is called a widow.
no ofcourse they arent.islam is against childlabor and harassing children and women.
Yes. Blood types do not make parents incompatible.