No. Section 207 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 407) protects Social Security benefits from assignment, levy, or garnishment. However, the law provides five exceptions: - to enforce child support oblications (Section 459 of the Act (45 U.S.C. 659)) - to collect unpaid Federal taxes (Section 6334 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 6334 (c))); - voluntary withholding to pay this year's Federal income tax liability (Section 3402 (P) of the Internal Revenue Code); - The Debt Collection Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-134) allows benefits to be withheld and paid to another Federal agency to pay a non-tax debt the beneficiary owes to that agency: and - The Tax Payer Relief Act of 1997 (Public Law 105-34) authorizes the Internal Revenue Service to collect overdue federal tax debts of beneficiaries by levying up to 15 percent of each monthly payment until the debt is paid. The Social Security Administration's responsibility for protecting benefits against legal process and assignment usually ends when the beneficiary is paid. However, once paid, benefits continue to be protected under section 207 of the Act only as long as they are identifiable as Social Security benefits. This applies to money in a bank account where the only payments into the account are from direct deposit of Social Security benefits. NOTE: Supplemental Security Income payments cannot be levied or garnished.
Yes,, That's what it's for. It pays for damages you caused to another.
The same as any other accident. If you have damages you submit a claim. If you have no damages then there is nothing to claim.
It is highly unlikely.
You get to, accident would not have happened if you werent on the road!
If the damage occurred during the accident in question, then it should.
As long as the policy was in effect at the time the accident occurred then coverage will be afforded and damages will be paid.
No. A "totalled" car is one whose value is less than the total cost of the repair.
Usually anyone that is responsible should pay for damages that they caused.
Road traffic accident claims involve seeking compensation for injuries, damages,
Sue
Sure. It certainly frowned upon, because often if you don't repair the damages to a vehicle, further damages can occur (frame damage, for instance, can mess up a car pretty badly if driven on for a year after the accident). Your carrier will make a note of it to their underwriting department, and depending on the seriousness of the damages or whether or not you mitigated your damages (ie, didn't incur further damages), it could affect your policy. But...at the time of the accident, if you were paying premiums for coverage on your car, your carrier is contractually obliged to take care of those damages. Just don't be surprised if they won't cover additional damages that resulted from not having the vehicle properly repaired right after the accident.
Oh yes, big time. If you are at fault and there are damages you can be sued for the damages.