De Beauvoir argues that in some situations, violence may be inevitable as a response to oppressive structures that perpetuate inequality. She suggests that violence can be morally justified when used as a means to resist and challenge systems of oppression that deny individuals their freedom and agency. However, she does not condone violence that is used for purely destructive or oppressive purposes.
yes they deserve it after what odysseus has gone through
While Odysseus' revenge can be seen as justified by some due to the wrongs he suffered at the hands of the suitors, others might argue that the extent of the violence and bloodshed he unleashed goes beyond what is morally acceptable. The ethical justification of his revenge is subjective and depends on individual perspectives on justice and retribution.
physical and verbal
Violence can lead to more violence because it can perpetuate a cycle of retaliation and revenge. When one party uses violence, it can provoke others to respond in kind, escalating the conflict further. Additionally, experiencing violence can cause psychological trauma and a desire for vengeance, further fueling the cycle.
Frantz Fanon was a prominent philosopher who focused on the topics of colonialism, racism, and decolonization. He argued that colonialism dehumanizes both the colonized and the colonizer, leading to violence and power struggles. Fanon advocated for the liberation of colonized peoples through revolutionary action and the creation of new, decolonized societies.
It is an extremely subjective question to ask if violence can ever be justified and everyone has a different answer. The question has been argued about in philosophy for centuries.
No
indeed
Jonh Adams
John Adams
yes
some of the public thought that the violence they used was justified for their cause but some people thought that the violence was the wrong way to go to get what they wanted.
Violence is bad because nothing good comes out of it. People die and get hurt and bad crimes happen. Girls get raped and get forced to do stuff they do not want to.
Yes Pierre trudeau was justified in using the war measures act. It was the only defence to cease the FLQs violence.
Violence exists for many reasons including those but not just those. A president once said that for any man with convictions violence is inevitable. We can infer that since there has been violence for thousands of years that none of those things are the sole bringer of violence.
yup
Yes, but only if peaceful methods are banned by the regime in power.