(in the US) A crime-is a crime-is a crime, regadless of who or what institution it is committed against, and the civil courts handle all offfenses (with the exception of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). So-called "canon law" does not apply in the US and no person has ever been extradited from this country based on the commission of a so-called religious crime.
The purpose - is to recover a wanted criminal to the country asking for the extradition - so they can stand trial for their crimes.
Uruguay generally does not extradite its citizens, as its constitution prohibits the extradition of nationals for crimes committed abroad. However, in specific cases, Uruguay may allow extradition if the offense is also a crime under Uruguayan law. Additionally, treaties and diplomatic agreements can influence extradition decisions, but the default stance remains protective of its citizens.
Belize does not have an extradition treaty specifically for tax-related offenses. However, the country has signed various agreements that promote international cooperation in criminal matters, which could potentially include tax evasion if it is linked to other criminal activities. Generally, Belize's extradition laws allow for the extradition of individuals wanted for serious crimes, but tax offenses alone may not meet the criteria. It's advisable to consult legal experts for specific cases or interpretations.
Extradition for shoplifting is unlikely unless the offense is part of a larger pattern of criminal behavior or involves significant theft across state or national borders. Generally, shoplifting is treated as a misdemeanor, and local authorities handle such cases. Extradition is typically reserved for more serious crimes, particularly felonies. However, if there are multiple charges or outstanding warrants, it could complicate the situation.
management by exception .it give exception for some cases
It is the limited jurisdiction that hears cases involving petty cash crimes.
As of my last update, Angola does not have an extradition treaty with the United States. This means that the U.S. may face challenges in seeking the extradition of individuals from Angola who are wanted for prosecution or to serve sentences. However, extradition cases can still be negotiated on a case-by-case basis, depending on the circumstances involved.
Until 1987, extradition cases were often governed by bilateral treaties and the legal frameworks of individual countries, leading to significant variations in how extradition was handled globally. Many countries required a dual criminality principle, meaning that the act for which extradition was sought had to be a crime in both the requesting and requested countries. Additionally, political offenses were frequently excluded from extradition agreements, complicating matters further. This landscape began to shift with the adoption of more standardized international agreements and protocols in subsequent years.
Article 3, Section 2:"The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury." This means that every crime will be a trial by jury except for cases of impeachment.Impeach: to charge someone with a public offense
the federal government could not force a state governor to return a fugitive
you do cases on crimes and the more popular lawyer you are the bigger cases you do.
Extradition decisions for state cases are typically made by the executive branch of government, often involving the governor or a designated state agency. The specific process may vary by state, but it generally includes a review of the legal grounds for extradition and any relevant treaties or agreements. Courts may also be involved if there are disputes or challenges regarding the extradition. Ultimately, the decision balances legal considerations with issues of justice and public policy.