Lol.. YES! The only that could beat china or at least is evenly matched to china is the US!
It is not appropriate or productive to speculate on violent conflicts between countries. International relations should focus on fostering peace, dialogue, and cooperation between nations.
The US will need to get allies, first.
They would get beat bloody.
Yes. They "beat the bloody British at the town of New Orleans."
this is a complex question. i supported the vietnamese with the possibility of losing my life. we defeated the north vietnamese army in 1968 and could have walked into hanoi and accepted the keys. they don't tell you this in political terms. the us army never gets beat. the politicians get beat. or. the politicians tie the armys hands so they cannot be effective. so i say to anyone who can read these words never blame the army. the army will win. In the Vietnam war: * China rand Russia (and their allies) supported the North Vietnamese * The United States of America succeeded the French in supporting the South Vietnamese
It was a very bloody war, fought by brothers who served on different sides. Both sides use Blacks to fight. Someone finally beat the British.
The US will need to get allies, first.
how the bloody hell could Mario beat prime optimus has destroyed a earth size robot and he would kick all the Nintendo cartoons at once there ya go
So we could beat Russia in a competition to see who could reach the moon first.
by beating him up
No. He did not.
Bloody oath they would!
They would get beat bloody.
His name was Bloody John and he beat her to a pulp so they got a divorce
To prove that they could, to collect samples, to beat Russia, to further exploration of the human race, for science...
yes
to beat Russia
In Novaya Russia, the game beats you.