Since animals cannot make their own food they are all ultimately dependent on plants for survival. Some plants could probably get along without animals, but many rely on various species for services like pollination and seed dispersal.
plants are help ful to animals because they are ugly
No. They could not under the current regime of life on Earth. Bacteria, in their symbiotic, detrivorous, and other roles are critical to the life functions of plants and animals. If all bacteria were to die out, it is likely that everything living on the planet would die out. Oddly enough, the bacteria could survive without animals or plants.
Well, without photosynthesis, the plants would not have energy for building their bodies. So with a little exagerration, it could be said that photosynthesis is building up the plants, which represent carbohydrates and other molecules needed by animals.
A parasite feeds on other plants and animals.
The survival of carnivores would be highly challenging if all plants became extinct. Without plants, there would be no primary producers, disrupting the entire food chain. Carnivores rely on herbivores as their prey, and without herbivores, carnivores would have limited food resources, leading to a reduced population and potential extinction.
You could not eat much because, animals depend on plants and other living things depend on this.
People are "animals". Animals can not make their own food they have to eat other animals and or plants to survive. Plants can make their own food (from air, water and sunlight) - they are the basis of all food - without plants there could be no animals.
plants are help ful to animals because they are ugly
No. They could not under the current regime of life on Earth. Bacteria, in their symbiotic, detrivorous, and other roles are critical to the life functions of plants and animals. If all bacteria were to die out, it is likely that everything living on the planet would die out. Oddly enough, the bacteria could survive without animals or plants.
Well, without photosynthesis, the plants would not have energy for building their bodies. So with a little exagerration, it could be said that photosynthesis is building up the plants, which represent carbohydrates and other molecules needed by animals.
Humans themselves do not use photosynthesis, but because humans depend on plants, as well as other animals that eat plants, in order to live, no, humans could not live without photosynthesis. Unless plants had another way to make food for themselves, humans could not live without photosynthesis.
True. Even animals that eat other animals rely on green plants- since the prey animals eat green plants. And animals all need oxygen- which is given off by green plants.
plants: sunlight for photosynthesis animals: plants, other animals
Animals that eat plants and other aniamls are called omlivor's
False, Animals can not live without plants.
First of all, humans need plants and other animals for food. It is impossible to live a healthy life without both of them. Also, plants take in CO2, cleaning our air, and give off oxygen, so we can breathe. Without plants we would not be able to breathe and our air would become very polluted.
Some animals eat grasses and other plants. Other animals feed on these animals that feed on plants. Some animals are omnivores ad feed on both plants and other animals,