The US is a litgation hungry society. Anyone can sue almost anyone for almost any reason. The issue is whether or not the court will hear the suit, and if the plaintiff can prevail. In such a situation it is unlikely the court would look favorably upon the plaintiff due to the fact that the person(s) continued to use the services after the stated time period had elapsed. The judge would likely presume that the plaintiff had the option of changing orthodonist but since they continued for an additional two years it would appear they were not dissatisfied with the service and therefore had no valid complaint.
Who is your role model?
Did Bill Nye go to jail?
Is 0.09 greater than 0.1?
What is the adverb in the sentence she slept late on Tuesday morning?
How do you get 1000000 robux for free?
Who would you swap lives with for a day?
What do prokaryotes and eukaryotes have in common?
How many times can 8 go into 72?
What should I know about coronavirus?
How many stars are in the Big Dipper?
What is the one food you could eat for the rest of your life?
What does a red flag mean on the beach?
What's the weirdest state symbol?
What is OK short for?
Is it possible to die of a broken heart?
How did they decide the point value of Scrabble letters?
Why is saw dust used in refractive index of liquid experiment
Does jimmy capps have children
What is the meaning of recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness
What are the similarities between ancient and modern maps
Who is the woman in the pcmatic commercial
What is meant by the statement that training is extremely faddish
What was common in eastern block nations