No.
First off, treason is the betrayal of the United States, while aiding or abetting the enemy.
No comment that is made can constitute treason, and frankly, there's absolutely no way that someone is going to be convicted of treason based only on circumstantial or testimonial evidence.
Unless your teacher tried to join a terrorist organization, or something similar, you're probably thinking of a different statute.
no because its based on someone else but then again im not sure about that one so look it up in our pramble of the US Constitution
the person found guilty
The Texians (peoples not originally from Texas) were guilty of treason for declaring their independance from Mexico. Similar to how colonial Americans were considered to be guilty of treason by the Brittish.
No. King Charles I thought it was impossible to have committed treason since he was the king. Whether he was in-fact guilty of treason is debatable.
yes he was found guilty
After they won independence from England, they were not guilty. While the colonies were under England's rule, they were guilty of treason to England.
Guilty of Treason - 1950 is rated/received certificates of: Belgium:Tous Canada:PG (Ontario) Sweden:(Banned)
They are arrested!
He was found guilty of treason.
It is what the victims were found guilty of.
No, but he was guilty of being French.
According to the British, treason.
Treason