Politics and Government
US Presidents
Iraq War
George W. Bush

Did George Bush lie about the WMDs in Iraq?

Top Answer
User Avatar
Wiki User
Answered 2013-03-27 15:58:50
More Like Dismissed Dissenting InformationIt has been reported by top CIA officials at the time that dissenting reports from CIA officers claiming the lack of weapons programs in Iraq were entirely dismissed by Bush himself before they were passed on to congress or the public.

Many quotes have surfaced from Democrats in an attempt to suggest the lie was a joint effort. However many of these quotes were made years before the invasion in an attempt to DIMINISH his WMD capacity utilizing UN sanctions, or were based off of what we now know was filtered intellegence.

Some of these statements include:

(But keep in mind that few of these Democrats argued that Iraq's weapons capacity was such a threat that pre-emptive war was justified. Many of the quotes are taken from the context of potential sanctions and other methods.)

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."

President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."

President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weaponsagainst us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."

Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."

Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destructionprograms."

Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."

Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."

Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham(D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."

Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."

Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."

Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and developing weapons of mass destruction."

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."

Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."

Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."

Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...

Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WMD'S AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES??? Right!!! No, he just did what the Democrats had been asking for since the Clinton administration.

Another opinion...Did George W Bush lie, mislead, or only tell part of the truth


Prior to the US invasion of Iraq, German Intelligence (the BND) provided one informant to the CIA, that informant's code name was curveball; recently his real name was reviled to be Rafid Ahmed Alwan. German Intelligence informed the CIA that they did not believe curveball's claims of Nuclear and Biological mobile weapons laboratories however; as allies do, the Germans handed curveball over to the US. The CIA fully vetted what curveball told them and concluded that "we believe that curveball is just telling us what we want to here".

The Bush administration omitted the fact that our own CIA, as well as German Intelligence, did not believe curveball when Bush submitted the case for war to the US Congress. The Bush administration also omitted the fact all the intelligence concerning mobile weapons laboratories was from one sole source without any corroboration.

Colin Powell's presentation to the United Nations concerning Iraq's mobile weapons laboratories was also based solely on the statements of curveball.

Germany was angered by the Bush Administration's omissions, and although they did fight with the US in Afghanistan, Germany refused to invade Iraq.


CBS News:

Associated Press:



French Intelligence had an informant who was a member of Saddam's cabinet, Naji Sabri, Iraq's foreign minister. Sabri told French Intelligence that Saddam had no significant, active biological weapons program. When Sabri spoke to the CIA he was asked if Saddam acquired enriched uranium could he build a nuclear bomb in "several months to a year."? Sabri stated that Saddam to a great extent wanted a nuclear bomb, but would not be able to build a nuclear device that quickly, he would require much more time. Sabri also informed both France and the CIA that Saddam's forces had buried nerve gas after the Iran Iraq war; he estimated the weapons cache at 500 metric tons. However; Sabri's estimates were incorrect as only a small amount of rusted and degraded canisters were actually found. Sabri never spoke of any link between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden.

Later Sabri ranted publicly that the Bush Administration only wanted to attack Iraq to secure its oil reserves.

France was angered by Bush Administration's ignoring of Sabri's statements, and although they did fight with the US in Afghanistan, France refused to invade Iraq.






Prior to the US invasion of Iraq, British Prime Minister Tony Blair's senior ministers meet on July 23, 2002 in a classified meeting at Downing Street. The notes from that meeting later were nicknamed the "Downing Street Memos" when they were published by the Sunday Times on May 1, 2005.

The memos state "Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

"It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force."

These and other statements contained in the Downing Street Memos showed that as George W Bush was publically stating war was the last option, Behind the Scenes according to the memos "It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action"


FOX News:,2933,158228,00.HTML

Times UK

Washington Post:


In late 2001, Italian Intelligence received documents that show Saddam Hussein's government was attempting to purchase yellow cake uranium from the country of Niger. These documents were handed over to the CIA and to Great Britain. By early 2002 both CIA and the State Department discovered the documents were forgeries.

Former Iraq Ambassador Joe Wilson was sent by senior officials in the US Government to look into the documents claims. Joe Wilson found no evidence that Saddam had attempted to purchase yellow cake uranium. After informing the Bush Administration of the fact that the documents were forgeries and Joe Wilson found no evidence of any sale of yellow cake uranium, the George Bush said in his State of the Union Address "the British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa".

Joe Wilson wrote an op-ed in the NY Times entitled "What I didn't find in Niger" refuting the Presidents statements. Shortly there after his wife, Valerie Plame Wilson, had her covert identity of a CIA officer blown in a column by Robert Novak.


Telegraph co.UK:

NY Times:

CBS News:

ABC News:


In the lead up to the US invasion of Iraq George W Bush made numerous statements, both direct and indirect, linking Saddam Hussein with the events of September 11th and Osama Bin Laden.

After exhaustive research the September 11 Report found no operational link between Saddam Hussien and Al Qaeda. The Pentagon and CIA also have found no operational link between Saddam Hussien and Al Qaeda and after the Iraq war George W Bush himself stated "I've seen no evidence that Saddam Hussien was involved with the September 11th."




Washington Post

Concerning the quotes above posted by the original author of this article

The Democratic quotes below are taken from two points in history, first just prior to December 17, 1999 concerning UNSCR 1284 which Created - "the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspections Commission (UNMOVIC) to replace previous weapon inspection team (UNSCOM)." Everyone in Congress demanded Saddam allow weapons inspectors in, and he did but, Saddam limited their access.

The second set of Democratic quotes are from around the time of the second UN Security Consol referendum Friday, November 8, 2002: "The United Nations Security Council approved a resolution that demanded unfettered access for U.N. inspectors to search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq." This time everyone in Congress demanded Saddam allow weapons inspectors and not limit their access and he did despite claims to the contrary.

Moreover, the second set of Democratic quotes, around the November 2002 date, were based on the intelligence as presented to them by the Bush Administration who omitted the fact that our own CIA as well as German Intelligence did not believe curveball when they submitted the case for war to the US Congress and curveball was one sole source of mobile weapons laboratories and without any corroborate. Congress was not told the whole truth.

An observation...It is clear, especially in today's highly charged political climate, that where definitive, factual responses to questions of this nature are not available, responders will, nonetheless, offer their opinions. Whether these opinions are motivated by a bona fide belief, or rather, by the furtherance of a political agenda, cannot be known. Readers should, therefore, take these answers not as conclusive responses, but as the opinions they are.

Remember, there is now every indication that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident, upon which LBJ justified escalating the war in Vietnam, either didn't happen, or was instigated by the US Navy, yet that information has taken some 40 years to come to the public's attention. History offers a perspective that no amount of desire can match. We may someday know the truth to this question and others like it, but in the interim, there can be little doubt that if there were any hard facts "as yet" supporting the contention that Bush intentionally lied about Iraq's WMD, this Democratic congress would have long ago initiated impeachment proceedings.

User Avatar

Your Answer

Related Questions

President Bush insisted that Iraq had WMDs. That was a lie. They didn't it was 100% the US's fault. Iraq did not provoke any sort of military action against them. 9/11 was also attempted to be connected to Saddam Hussein but it to this day has no proof in its favor. Or any reason to believe that.

Because, Bush needed to justify the war in Iraq

This requires a person to know the mind of the President. We know that he was factually incorrect, but in order to "lie", the person lying needs to know that the information was factually incorrect at the time he makes it. I personally believe that the President wanted a reason to invade Iraq so badly (to make up for his father's "mistake" of not overthrowing Saddam Hussein), that he did not question the faulty evidence provided him and wanted to believe it. As a result, I believe that Bush actually believed his incorrect statement to be true, which means that he was not lying.

Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11! The NeoCons just wanted an excuse to takeover Iraq and get their money grubbing fingers on Iraq's oil. At first they made up the lie that Iraq had WMDs, but after the invasion no WMDs were found in Iraq. They then came up with the excuse that they wanted to spread democratic values and since the American people's memory is so short they fell for the lie! THIS IS A LIE WRITTEN BY A NEOCON!!! One day some Muslims decided to bomb our city using our planes as their missiles. Because in the search for the culprits, our leadership found that Saddam Husein was backing these terrorists with his own money and support. Because Saddam was continuing his support and wanted to help in future attacks of a greater magnitude we went after him. Because if we did not go there the terrorists would have come here - again and again and again, until they had killed us all. And because some Muslims twisted the Quran and teach many people this teaching of Quran. But there is some Muslims know they are wrong.

Yes. Iran lies between Iraq and Afghanistan.

His U.S. economic policies, and it's relationship to the oil industry. Therefore, it's pretext for war; "Operation Desert Storm." As WMD turned out to be a lie.

Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and western Iraq

the need for a strong national union You liar! LIE LIE LIE !

It's present day Iraq... and Persia is Iran...

Britain went to war with Iraq because of a lie, it was supposdly a WMD that started it, but there was no proof of a MWD in the first place. timothy the cat.

Afghanistan. Any claims that they trained in Iraq is a lie. Iraq is a Sunni country, and Al-Qaeda is made up of Shi'a radicalists

Bush fallow farming is a method of farming where virgin land is clear-cut and then allowed to lie fallow before being planted.

I know: Your Love is Just a Lie Simple Plan Live a Lie Default Every Lie My Darkest Days Lie David Cook Don't Lie Black eyed Peas Beautiful Lie 30 seconds to Mars Lie to me George Nozuka

Babylon is the most famous city in ancient Mesopotamia whose ruins lie in modern-day Iraq

No Moses did not lie when he said God told him to lead the Israelite out of Egypt.God told him to go to Pharaoh from the burning bush.

It is a name for the Tigris-Euphrates river system, roughly corresponding to most of Iraq and Kuwait and eastern parts of Syria. Also parts along the Turkish/Syrian and Iran/Iraq borders

no they did not lie about their ages :D When the Beatles were in Hamburg George Harrison lied about his age because he wasn't 18.

Joshua Ownes is a monkey, and he is a lie, saying he is related to george washington what a tard.... hahahah

George T. Angwin has written: 'Constructing algebras from Lie and Hopf algebras'

The Outback is located in Australia, and encompasses the remote areas of Australia which extend beyond "the bush". "The bush" refers to the areas which lie outside the main urban areas of the country.

This Question calls for Opinions, regarding the President's culpability, therefore different expressions exist. 1. No. He is an honest, decent person, trying to take care of the USA, in spite of everything that might imply differently. 2. That is an opinionated question. Some think he is, and some think he isn't. Most just think that it doesn't really matter, because he is making such bad decisions. *Not Judge 3. I personally think he is a liar because there was no serious reason to beginning a war and if he wants a war that badly why doesn't he goes and fight it him self. The definition of a lie is to say something you know to be untrue. Did President Bush lie about WMD or was he like most foreign intelligence agencies convinced Iraq had WMD. He may have been wrong but it was not a lie. Bush said we will get Osama. That very well may come to pass, and Bush did not say when we would get him. Not a lie. Removing a tyrant who murdered his own people and allowing the people of Iraq to vote and choose their own leaders and write a Constitution sounds like Democracy to me. If I had a mayor in my town like Saddam, I would welcome a liberator. The people who are murdering innocent civilians are the terrorists who do not want democracy in Iraq. This is upsetting me , so I just have to... Weapons of mass destruction- You want to know where? Where's your proof that they don't have them? Iraq set up all these armies and they KNOW the reason as to why the attack was on them. So, if Iraq knew...Why didn't they tell us they didn't? Democracy- So...You think killing your own people is a good thing? We're not taking away their customs, just the cruel ideas of "good government" Bush admitted there were no weapons or al-qaeda links. They did present manufactured evidence to the UN. The international intelligence committee was not convinced of the WMDs. Saddam may have killed some of his own people and was more than likely a wanker, but we killed over 100,000 more Iraqis than Saddam did during his whole reign. The silly person above thinks "good government" is starting a preemptive war, occupying a country under false pretenses, and slaughtering people. Bush, Cheney, Rice, Powell and Rumsfeld all lied, in the true definition of the word. It is all documented. They should have the same trial as Saddam, and be subject to the save verdict. Honestly, believe what you want. I believe he is not a liar. He has not lied to us at all. If you say he has killed so many of our soldiers...Look at past presidents. Some of our past presidents lost many more soldiers than we are now and they weren't even in a war. Bush did not say when we would find the weapons nor did he say when we would catch Osama. The only thing that I see wrong with this country is how blinded Americans are by the Media.

Yes what do you call false teeth?

I like big butts and I can not lie.

George tells the boss that Lennie was kicked in the head by a horse when he was younger (but this is a lie).

Copyright ยฉ 2021 Multiply Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply.