He was accused of being drunk. He had to sit out in the cold wind and somebody gave him some alcoholic tonic so he may have been on his way to intoxication but if so, it was an unhappy accident. He was not used to alcohol .
Andrew Johnson
The Vice President, Andrew Johnson.
If you're referring to President Andrew Johnson, no one killed him. He was Abraham Lincoln's Vice-President, and assumed the office of President after Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth in 1865. Andrew Johnson died of a stroke in 1875.
he got drunk and he cussed out all the butlers
No, that would be unconstitutional.
Booth personally killed only President Lincoln. However, his co-conspirator Lewis Powell (aka Paine) made an attempt on the life of Secretary of State William Seward. A third conspirator, George Atzerodt, was supposed to kill Vice President Andrew Johnson, but got drunk and didn't go through with it.
The House impeached the President, but the Senate failed to remove him. The House of Representatives voted to impeach Johnson but the Senate failed----by only one vote----to win the two-thirds majority necessary in the Senate to remove Johnson from office!
No, he is actually drunk and he is smoking weed.
None. Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton are the only Presidents to have been impeached. Both were acquitted President Nixon resigned August 9, 1974 before the Senate could vote on his impeachment
President Andrew Johnson had a very difficult and antagonistic relationship with the so-called "Radical Republicans" in Congress. They accused him of being a drunk and said he was an ignorant man who was incapable of doing the work the presidency required. He in turn believed their attacks on him were totally partisan and without any foundation other than a desire to drive him from office because they felt he was too much of a moderate. The bickering escalated: the Radical Republicans were especially angered by some of the decisions Johnson made (such as replacing Secretary of War Edwin Stanton with Ulysses S. Grant), and they became determined to have Johnson impeached; in late February 1868, the House of Representatives did in fact impeach him. Johnson's trial, on the grounds of "high crimes and misdemeanors" began in March 1868. Johnson was not a very popular president, but the press and some of the public believed the entire series of events was politically motivated. Johnson's trial ultimately ended with his acquittal by the senate, and he was able to complete his term.
No, that would be unconstitutional.The constitution itself does not handle such an instance which would be very unlikely to happen.
Franklin Pierce