History will be required to make that judgement, and perhaps 200 years from now it will be a very minor footnote in US History, Economics and Policy. The economic costs continue to mount because economic warfare using borrowed money may require generations to get paid off. Supply Side economics remains an unproven concept, only because history hasn't had the chance to judge it. Strangely, the most liberal President (William Jefferson Clinton) since FDR came the closest to getting the bank account balanced. While current income is untaxed in a progressive manner, future great-great Grandchildren will still be paying off the mortgage. The earth may not have been destroyed in a nuclear Armageddon, however the tab must be paid someday.
The cold war ended happily for the US while Reagan was President.
Winning it
He will go down in history and be credited with winning the 50 year Cold War without firing a shot. He also managed to lower taxes during his presidency.
Ronald Reagan was around 70 years old during the cold war. But it also depends what cold war you are talking there were 5 cold wars.
hes stupid
hes stupid
They are Ronald Regan and Eisenhower
The West.
Lee was winning the battles, but Grant was winning the war by crowding him into a corner.
Fidel Castro
Ronald Reagan
He ended the cold war and kept the economy stable