Yes. But mostly in the north of the country. They were a minor group though. Because Chile wasn't a rich country like Peru, slaves were too expensive to buy and families that could afford them usually have them as house slaves more than fields slaves, except in the north. Also, they were usually bought by convents , who teach them to read and them sell them to a higher price. The minor population, became even more small after the freedom of womb law in 1812, that made children of slaves be free, so most of the slaves that were free now, leave the country and return home or move to Argentina.
yes
ugh
the African countries were brought slaves were Uganda & rwanda
none the slaves did not own ships
African culture was shared by the African slaves
Well, your mom had quite a few slaves back in the day
Spain
ugh
Spain and Portugal.
Primarily, Spain was colonizing (such as Morocco and the Equatorial Guinea), but it was also involved in the transportation of African slaves to the Americas.
The first African slaves were brought to Virginia by the English in the 17th Century, but Spain probably had them in their American colonies earlier than that.
spain
No queen of Spain is responsible for African slavery. Slavery has been going on for thousands of years. People were often made slaves when they lost a battle or war. Pirates as far as Ancient Rome and Greece sold slaves from many places .
to replace Indian slaves with African slaves
Spain began sending African slaves to South America, where they had founded colonies, in the 1500's, or more particularly, around 1510. Before this, the Spainards in South America used the Native Americans as slaves. However, African slaves were more used to rigerous farm work and heat, so they worked longer and harder than the Native Americans.
African tribes lacked the technology to make European manufactured goods.
he revised laws regarding the use of African slaves
Taino