Yes they had weapons for hunting and for fighting. They used bronze and made weapons of iron. They had javelins, crossbows, axes, slings and bows. They even were known to put poison on their weapons.
Of course they did - for hunting, defending themselves against invading forces and for internal warfare.
A person who studies ancient weapons might be a military historian, or might be an archaeologist. There is more than one reason to study ancient weapons.
No. The colonists were tipped off that the British were coming and moved the weapons.
The Romans made their weapons.
By weapons tradesmen in each of the cities.
Weapons were needed for defense of the country from attack.
bkcjbdc ewd The British .303 bolt action Lee-Enfield Rifle.
in ancient times
M. V. Gorelik has written: 'Oruzhie drevnego Vostoka' -- subject(s): Ancient Armor, Ancient Weapons, Armor, Ancient, Weapons, Ancient 'Armii mongolo-tatar X-XIV vekov' -- subject(s): Ancient Armor, Ancient Weapons, Armies, Armor, Ancient, History, Military art and science, Weapons, Ancient
A person who studies ancient weapons might be a military historian, or might be an archaeologist. There is more than one reason to study ancient weapons.
Ancient people used obsidian ( rocks used to make weapons)
No. The colonists were tipped off that the British were coming and moved the weapons.
The Romans made their weapons.
Hand axes, sharpened stones and cutting tools were the tools and weapons of ancient man.
By weapons tradesmen in each of the cities.
Weapons such as Bronze swords.
weapons weapons and coins
No, there were weapons way before the Roman Empire.