Not really because all he really wanted was money and he was acting selfish.
No it was not signed by anyone but it was indentured by King John's royal seal.
King John signed the Magna Carta, which guaranteed some fundamental rights. He was pressured into this by the barons and for the sake of the barons, but some basic rights extended to everyone.
Nothing
There's no consensus on whether King John was a good king. Many consider him to have been a bad ruler, but others think he was effective. Regardless of the presence of dissenting opinions, he tends to be portrayed negatively in the media.
No, King Tut did not eat others. In fact, he did lots of good things for his peope.
Anything he wanted to. It's good to be the King!
my friend it is king henry because king john is a good king in them days
No it was not signed by anyone but it was indentured by King John's royal seal.
king john had 2 sons for heres and kept clean
King John signed the Magna Carta, which guaranteed some fundamental rights. He was pressured into this by the barons and for the sake of the barons, but some basic rights extended to everyone.
to help the fall of romen empires. this is not a good site for school. everyone an anyone with no knowledge can write anything they wantt.
Nothing
There's no consensus on whether King John was a good king. Many consider him to have been a bad ruler, but others think he was effective. Regardless of the presence of dissenting opinions, he tends to be portrayed negatively in the media.
No, King Tut did not eat others. In fact, he did lots of good things for his peope.
he played with his own poop REALLY!!!!!!!!!
ov corse : )
no, simple as, all he did was lose it.