0
no.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What evidence do scientists use to support the geocentric theory?
i'm not sure so why dont u ask ur teacher man? LOL
What evidence can scientists provide to support the Big Bang theory?
There is cosmic background radiation that is thought to be the "smoke" after the big bang which can still be measured in space today. This is low energy radio waves (which we pick up as static) that can be detected at about the same level wherever we look, leading scientists to think that it is the result of the entire universe having expanded from a single point. Then there is a specific ratio of the elements. After the Big Bang, it is believed only the simpler elements, such as hydrogen and helium, existed and that all other elements were created in the high energy environment of stars.==================================Once again, the question has the whole thing backwards.Scientists do not get together at the coffee shop to dream up a theory, and thengo out looking for evidence to support it. That's not how it works. Scientists makemeasurements and observations that describe what is, and then work to assemblea theory that can explain the evidence they already have.From that point, their job is to tell a good theory from a bad one. Any theory thatseems to explain what has already been seen also predicts things that have notbeen seen yet, and that leads to the other half of the scientists' job ... testingthe predictions of the theory. NOT looking for evidence to support it, but testingthe predictions it makes to see whether they're true ... Or not. If most of themare true, then the theory survives, with possibly a few changes. If most of themare not true, then the theory is out. The evidence is still there, along with thenew evidence that came from testing the predictions, but the theory itself is asgood as gone.Scientists are human people, which leads to the inconvenient fact that there aregood scientists and poor ones. The scientists who go around looking for evidenceto support their favorite theory are generally not the good ones.
How does red-shift support the steady state theory?
Red shift does not support the steady state theory.
Why did other scientists not accept Alfred Wegeners theory?
why did other scientist not accpet Alfred Wegeners theory
Can scientists create another planet?
in theory they can, but they havn't
If new evidence does not support a scientific theory scientists will most likely?
modify the theory or discard it altogether.
Why was wegener's theory not accepted by all scientists?
Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
How long was it before new evidence emerged to support wegener's original theory?
In the 1960's scientists uncovered new evidence that seemed to support Wegener's theory.
What is the primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth?
Fossils.
Do you think it's wise for scientists not to accept a theory immediately even if the theory has a lot of evidence to support it?
Each scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.
What do you think scientists would do if they found evidence that did not support the Big Bang theory?
Discard it all.
Why did most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift?
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
What Scientific is the term used for a scientific theory that is generally accepted by an overwhelming number of scientists?
that research and observations support the theorythat research and observations support the theory is the correct answer
A physical representation of an atom is an example of a scientific?
If new evidence does not support a scientific theory, scientists will most likely
What scientists use to support the big bang theory?
The Doppler effect and background cosmic radiation are the big ones.
Astronomers use various tools to gather evidence in support of the Big Bang Theory What are two tools used?
Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.
What did dobereiners law of triads state?
New land law
