0
What else can I help you with?
What evidence do scientists use to support the geocentric theory?
i'm not sure so why dont u ask ur teacher man? LOL
How does red-shift support the steady state theory?
Red shift does not support the steady state theory.
What evidence can scientists provide to support the Big Bang theory?
There is cosmic background radiation that is thought to be the "smoke" after the big bang which can still be measured in space today. This is low energy radio waves (which we pick up as static) that can be detected at about the same level wherever we look, leading scientists to think that it is the result of the entire universe having expanded from a single point. Then there is a specific ratio of the elements. After the Big Bang, it is believed only the simpler elements, such as hydrogen and helium, existed and that all other elements were created in the high energy environment of stars.==================================Once again, the question has the whole thing backwards.Scientists do not get together at the coffee shop to dream up a theory, and thengo out looking for evidence to support it. That's not how it works. Scientists makemeasurements and observations that describe what is, and then work to assemblea theory that can explain the evidence they already have.From that point, their job is to tell a good theory from a bad one. Any theory thatseems to explain what has already been seen also predicts things that have notbeen seen yet, and that leads to the other half of the scientists' job ... testingthe predictions of the theory. NOT looking for evidence to support it, but testingthe predictions it makes to see whether they're true ... Or not. If most of themare true, then the theory survives, with possibly a few changes. If most of themare not true, then the theory is out. The evidence is still there, along with thenew evidence that came from testing the predictions, but the theory itself is asgood as gone.Scientists are human people, which leads to the inconvenient fact that there aregood scientists and poor ones. The scientists who go around looking for evidenceto support their favorite theory are generally not the good ones.
Why did other scientists not accept Alfred Wegeners theory?
why did other scientist not accpet Alfred Wegeners theory
What might cause a scientists to reject a theory?
that thars not enuph proph
How do scientist prove a theory?
Scientists prove a theory by conducting experiments, making observations, and collecting data that support the theoretical predictions. Consistent and reproducible results from these experiments provide evidence to support the theory. Additionally, peer review and scrutiny by other scientists help validate the theory.
Why was wegener's theory not accepted by all scientists?
Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
Do you think it's wise for scientists not to accept a theory immediately even if the theory has a lot of evidence to support it?
Each scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.
What do you think scientists would do if they found evidence that did not support the Big Bang theory?
Discard it all.
What Scientific is the term used for a scientific theory that is generally accepted by an overwhelming number of scientists?
that research and observations support the theorythat research and observations support the theory is the correct answer
If new evidence does not support a scientific theory scientists will most likely?
if new evidence doesn't support a scientific theory, scientists will either revise the theory to accommodate the new evidence or discard the theory altogether in favor of a more accurate explanation. This process is crucial for the progress of science as it ensures that theories are continuously tested and refined to reflect our understanding of the natural world.
What scientists use to support the big bang theory?
The Doppler effect and background cosmic radiation are the big ones.
What did dobereiners law of triads state?
New land law
How does a scientist prove a theory?
A scientist can prove a theory by conducting experiments, collecting data, and analyzing results to see if they consistently support the predictions made by the theory. The more evidence that aligns with the theory's predictions, the stronger the support for the theory. Additionally, peer review and replication of results by other scientists help confirm the validity of a theory.
What is the primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth?
The primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth is radiometric dating of rocks and fossils. By measuring the decay of radioactive isotopes within these materials, scientists can estimate their ages and establish a timeline for Earth's history that stretches back billions of years.
Why don't scientists accept the steady state theory?
Scientists do not widely accept the steady state theory because it does not align with observed evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the Hubble expansion of the universe. These observations strongly support the Big Bang theory, which is the prevailing cosmological model.
What are two tools used to gather evidence in support of big bang theory?
If you browse around this category, you will find several similar questions with replies that answer your query. ==================================== Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.
