Yes, they established a colony for retired soldiers on the site.
Carthage did not give anyone to Rome. Rome captured prisoners of war, but they were not actually given to her by Carthage. Rome demanded that Carthage surrender Hannibal to her, but he fled into exile in the eastern Mediterranean.
There were three Punic Wars, and the third one took place in Carthage. The city suffered a three-year Roman siege before being destroyed.
Boudica attacked Camulodunum (Colchester), Londinium (London) and Verulanium (St Albans). She did not take over these cities from the Romans. She destroyed them and then kept moving on until she was defeated.
carthage was to big for romes likings and were afraid. they had no choice but to fight them. rome fourght carthage three times and won the islands between the to empires and than soon became bigger and were able to take over carthage and did this is how rome became big and over took.
yes, they did take over. the reason was beacause the romans were starting to forget what rome was all about.
They defeated Carthage
The Romans , after winning the Punic Wars over their rival Carthage , ruled over the Mediterranean Sea .
Carthage did not give anyone to Rome. Rome captured prisoners of war, but they were not actually given to her by Carthage. Rome demanded that Carthage surrender Hannibal to her, but he fled into exile in the eastern Mediterranean.
While Hannibal's plan did allow him to bypass the Roman army and sack the city of Rome itself, Carthage did ultimate lose the war. It's impossible to know if there was anything that Hannibal could have done "better." It's entirely possible that Rome was always going to win the war no matter what Carthage did, simply because they were so much bigger and more powerful that Carthage had no chance to defeat them. The fact that they prevailed in spite of the capital being sacked certainly adds credence to that argument. One should also note that following the war the Romans destroyed Carthage completely. They did not subjugate it or add it to the empire, but wiped it out of existence. You could, again, argue that they would have done that no matter what, but you could also make the case that they destroyed Carthage because of Hannibal's attack on the city of Rome. If you take those views together, then it was certainly a bad idea, and in the long run only provoked the Romans into even greater reprisals against Carthage. Had Hannibal fought a conventional war then he would still have lost, but the Romans might not have destroyed Carthage completely after their victory.
They wanted to spread the word of Star Fox 64 so everyone would do barrel rolls and hate slippy the annoying frog who can't do anything and always has someone on his tail which he does not have because he is a frog.
There were three Punic Wars, and the third one took place in Carthage. The city suffered a three-year Roman siege before being destroyed.
Sicily.
There is no definitive answer to this as you do not ask where or what they took over
most of Europe
It means Islam must be Destroyed. It is a take off of the ancient Roman expression: "Cathago delende est." Or: "Carthage must be destroyed.", spoken over and over by Cato, warning against coexistence with a predatory rival. The word Islam means "Submission", and it comes from the Arabic word 'ASLAMA' which means subservience, obeisance, or surrender to GOD.
Why not take the trouble to write your question so that it is readily understandable.
Boudica attacked Camulodunum (Colchester), Londinium (London) and Verulanium (St Albans). She did not take over these cities from the Romans. She destroyed them and then kept moving on until she was defeated.