answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Absolutely not. Nowhere in the available transcripts or Court opinions did anyone express the idea that Mormonism is "only partly a religion under the First Amendment," nor did the record denigrate members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints as being anything less than Christian.*

Chief Justice Waite, in delivering the opinion of the Court, quoted from Thomas Jefferson's letter to Danbury Baptist Association:

"Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God; that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship; that the legislative powers of the government reach actions only, and not opinions -- I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore man to all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties."

"Coming as this does from an acknowledged leader of the advocates of the measure, it may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the amendment thus secured. Congress was deprived of all legislative power over mere opinion, but was left free to reach actions which were in violation of social duties or subversive of good order."

The Court ruled that government had a legitimate interest in prohibiting plural marriages, and that religious belief was not a valid reason for violating the law. As such, the US Supreme Court held that the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act of 1862 (not to be confused with the Morrill Land-Grant Act, passed the same year), criminalizing polygamy, was constitutional and not a violation of the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause.

The Mormon Church renounced plural marriage in 1890, and instructed its followers to adhere to the laws of the United States.

*[The federal government forced the Church to unincorporate under the Edmunds-Tucker Act of 1887, confiscating certain church-owned property, revoking the Mormons' right to vote and hold public office, and increasing the legal penalties for polygamy, but this occurred nearly a decade after Reynolds, and was politically motivated. The Act was finally repealed in 1978.]

Case Citation:

Reynolds v. United States, 98 US 145 (1878)

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did the US Supreme Court rule in Reynolds v. US that Mormonism was only partly a religion under the First Amendment?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How has the Supreme Court interpreted religious freedoms under the First Amendment?

The first amendment states that everyone is entitled to freedom of religion and should not be a law in favor of any religion or prohibiting a religion.


What is the supreme court's position on the Thu amendment?

There is no thu amendment.


Has the supreme court put limitations on the free exercise of religion in the US?

This is called the free exercise clause of the first amendment. Yes, the court has placed some limitations on the exercise of religion. The supreme court has ammended this clause to make the ability to act on religious beliefs non absolute.


What amendment has never been subject to a supreme court?

ninth amendment


Which amendment did the Supreme Court cite in its Roe v Wade decision?

14th Amendment


What amendment is polygamy in?

Polygamy is not in any amendment, it was outlawed by a Supreme Court decision.


Did prohibition violate the first amendment?

It could be argued that prohibition violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment. However, according to multiple state supreme court decisions going back to 1855, prohibition laws were a violation of the US Constitution. This is why The 18th Amendment needed to be written to enact prohibition.


How can the first amendment be bad for the U.S?

Sometimes very destructive and criminal acts are performed in the name of religion. Freedom of religion is certainly a good thing, but I personally would put some additional clarification into the first amendment, about what constitutes religion. There are also many legal issues about the limits of freedom of speech, which wind up being decided by the Supreme Court, and again, it could be useful to define freedom of speech in greater detail, in the actual amendment. It would be difficult to argue that the first amendment is actually bad for the US, but I would certainly argue that the first amendment could be improved.


The right to a trial by jury is in the Bill of Rights?

6th Amendment


Was the abolition of slavery a US Supreme Court decision?

No. Slavery was abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution in a joint effort between Congress and the states that ratified the amendment. A constitutional amendment is more powerful than a US Supreme Court decision, because it is not subject to change by the Supreme Court.


What resulted from the supreme court decisions in Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims?

The Supreme Court decisions in Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims resulted in more equal representation. In Reynolds v. Sims, the court stated that state legislature districts had to be approximately equal in terms of population.


When is the US Supreme Court going to stop the First Amendment?

The US Supreme Court is not going to "stop the First Amendment"; they lack authority to change the Constitution. Article V of the US Constitution explains the formal amendment process.