No. The Bill of Rights did promise rights and freedom for the citizens of the states but not the Articles of Confederation.
The assembly that replaced the Articles of Confederation was the Bill of Rights.
the bill of rights
A bill of rights
Declaration of Independence in 1776.
Bill of Rights
Yes, because you could actually use your rights under the articles of confederation but with bristish rule you couldnt. Like as in freedom of speech you may use it in the Usa but you couldnt under bristish rule, well at least not all the time
by the bill of rights
the bill of rights
It allowed congress to do things they the couldn't when they had the Articles of Confederation around. Such as raise taxes and have natural rights.
The Articles of Confederation were not specific enough. Until the Constitution was written and the Bill of Rights were added, states such as Virginia refused to sign.
The idea that a strong central government threatens the rights of the people and of the states was a major influence on the authors of the Articles of Confederation.
The Articles of Confederation were replaced by the Constitution because it included the Bill of Rights.