They sure do, they also do the same work that their staff do, as well as other responsibilities.
lt is a fair satement,ruling can be defined as deciding with authority.Hence, managers rule their staff all day because they have the authority to give orders and instructions.Other tasks perfomed by managers include planning,leading,controllling and organising.
Yes, managers are responsible for various tasks throughout the day. They also have to create reports to turn into top management.
If that was the case then there would be a lot more women managers than men, but it is not the case.
Laissez-faire, because the main managers (eg. CEO) are less likely to know what I going on so could just take no interest at all. This could mean they lose efficiency in business matters, and therefore money. Also, if you give more power to managers at individual stores, they may become more autocratic, rather than listening to staff or looking after staff, because they have fewer checks on how they are running the stores.
Not much more than minimum.
Yes, managers do more than rule over their staff. They are responsible for reporting trends and researching how to motivate their employees.
I think they do more than rule their staff for the growth of an organisation they motivate them.As we know that managers are divided into three stages top managers,middle managers and lower managers.The top gives instructions to the middle managers and the middle managers gives those instructions into the lower managers (supervisors/workers).So the lower managers do not just rule,but do all the work and find ways to meet organisational goals.
lt is a fair satement,ruling can be defined as deciding with authority.Hence, managers rule their staff all day because they have the authority to give orders and instructions.Other tasks perfomed by managers include planning,leading,controllling and organising.
Yes, managers are responsible for various tasks throughout the day. They also have to create reports to turn into top management.
Managers are not more important than staffs. They are equally important as managers would need the staffs to meet the objectives of the organizations and staffs need managers for guidance and coordination.
Top Performing managers has more responsibilities than an average managers.
ask cownine
If that was the case then there would be a lot more women managers than men, but it is not the case.
Staff is more rearward than it is increasing, imho
They aren't necessarily more successful than men as HR managers there are just more women in that line of work.
Laissez-faire, because the main managers (eg. CEO) are less likely to know what I going on so could just take no interest at all. This could mean they lose efficiency in business matters, and therefore money. Also, if you give more power to managers at individual stores, they may become more autocratic, rather than listening to staff or looking after staff, because they have fewer checks on how they are running the stores.
as the rules of lawmaking get more complex then more staff is needed