It was Mahatma Gandhi.
Canada gives one an idea of that, as it's still linked to Britain.
Yes great Britain did
No, the American people would probably still be under Britan's rule today if they had lost the war.
Britain ended its government of India in August 1947 and the nations of India and Pakistan were created.
India is self-ruled now, but it used to be controlled by the United Kingdom.
I believe Gandhi's dream was to free India from Britain rule.
The tea trade and production of tea played an important role in the British rule of India because since Tea was such an important commodity to Britain they needed to get it from either India or China. The tea trade, after all, was the main reason Britain began to rule over India to begin with. Britain no longer wanted to have to rely on China for their supply of tea. Britain began to look for alternatives to China. What they found was India. They were able to produce enough tea to be able to almost completely rely on India instead of China for their tea.
The 2 negative outcomes of British rule in India included India becoming a target for enemies of Britain, and the suppression of the Indian Mutiny in 1857-1858.
Marthi's essay on India after Independence is called "Divide and Rule Policy in India". It highlights how the country was before and after Great Britain was in power.
Britain by its policy of Divide and Rule were able to capture some provinces of India. Taking advantage of the situation, the British destroying the Indian Industry and Commerce, exported raw materials of India to England to develop Britain and then they were exporting from England the manufactured products making India dependent on Britain with its own production and industry totally crippled.
He boycotted British goods as an act to free India from Great Britain's rule. This act improved India's government and caused economic struggles in Britain itself.