In general, if a company policy conflicts with a state law, the state law will take precedence. Companies are expected to comply with all laws and regulations that apply to their operations, even if their internal policies differ.
If a state were able to override a federal law, it would create a situation of legal conflict and confusion. This could lead to inconsistencies in how laws are applied within the country, potentially undermining the effectiveness of the federal legal system and threatening national unity.
An exception to the full faith and credit clause is the public policy exception. This exception allows a state to refuse to recognize a law or judgment from another state if doing so would violate the public policy of the state being asked to enforce the law or judgment.
The legislature makes the laws.
A policy that does not adhere to the standard guidelines or regulations set forth by the Uniform Provisions Law would be considered non-compliant. This could include policies that deviate from the prescribed requirements, fail to meet the necessary standards, or overlook essential provisions outlined in the law.
To pass a bill over a presidential veto, Congress must achieve a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This level of support is needed to override the president's objection and enact the bill into law without their approval.
Of course not. We have enough trouble maintaining reasonable laws throughout the land. We would have utter chaos if companies could override any state or federal law just by writing a policy. Local, state and federal laws always trump a company's policies.
preemption
yes
study island: it gave Congress the authority to override state law to regulate commerce
In California, when a union contract and state law are in conflict, then whichever provides more benefit to the employee prevails.
As long as a policy is not contrary to the provisions of law or government regulations, a company can introduce and enforce any policy it wants within the limits of its employment and union contracts.
No.
its not a law and will not a law
supremacy clause- federal law ranks supreme over state laws
It's the company rule. State law allows a bit more than that.
no It depends. Counties can set more restrictive laws than states. The more restrictive laws will always dominate. "Dry counties" are a good example of this. The "state law" says that drinking is legal for anyone over the age of 21. The "county law" says it isn't legal, for anyone, at any age. The county law, in this case, is correct. If the county law was LESS restrictive than the state law, then the state law would dominate. But counties generally don't bother making laws that they know will be meaningless. Therefore, in almost every case where a county has a drinking law that differs from the state law, the county law will override the state law.
A Last Will and Testament has authority and legitimacy in any jurisdiction because and only because it has been made legitimate by the laws of that jurisdiction. That is, for a Will to be considered valid in Oklahoma, it must conform to Oklahoma law. The law does not override the Will because the will has no effect without the law in the first place.