Barring being able to prove fraud or such like...and that basically you didn't protest when you could (although that may not hae done anything either)....nope, It is a fete compli'.
Yes, but with new bankruptcy laws having been implemented it may prove somewhat difficult. The involved parties will need to prove to the trustee/court that they are unable to meet the obligation. More than likely the trustee will suggest the "13" be modified rather than dismissed. If the BK is dismissed the debtor loses all BK protection and creditors may pursue collection, repossession and lawsuits as the so choose.
It had only been ALLEGED that he was in love with his guitarest. It had not been proven. Also, the girl that danced in 'the way you make me feel' kissed him on one of his tours, and was then dismissed for the rest of the tour, so it was obviosly not love on both sides.
You must first find out how the band and the songs are being licensed by contacting them. If you do use names and songs there is a potential for legal recourse if the owners feel as though they have been defamed, libeled, or cheated out of copyright royalties and such.
the manga is still ongoing which means that it does not not end at chpt 127.... there is more to come even though the manga has probably not yet been released Yes it has stopped on chapter 126 but chap 127 is to come out on February 5 2010... and more chapters to come Read the whole manga at mangafox.com/manga/gakuen_alice/ They update it so don't worry!
Although her latest relationship with One Direction's Harry Styles has been dismissed by one source as a publicity gambit, Taylor Swift was seen out with another British singer, Tom Odell, in mid-February.She currently does not have a boyfriend.
A debtor can dismiss a Chapter 13 bankruptcy at any time without a fee, except perhaps for any remaining attorney's fees that have not been paid under the Chapter 13 plan. A debtor cannot voluntarily dismiss a Chapter 7 without filing a motion wiht the court. Even then, the debtor must be able to demonstrate that no prejudice to creditor if the Chapter 7 is dismissed. The debtor can convert the 7 to 13 (which does involve a fee) and then dismiss the Chapter 13.
Yes. It is usually the only other option for a borrower. If not the creditor might seek legal recourse in the form of a lawsuit. Even though the idea of a lawsuit is "scary" it can be a better choice than BK, depending on circumstances of the borrower.
No, once a bankruptcy is dismissed it has to be refiled after the time limit has expired. The time limit to refile after a chapter 13 dismissal is two years.
Two years after the date of the chapter 13 dismissal.
Once a 13 is dismissed creditors can pursue collection by whatever means allowed under the debtor's state laws, this usually includes lawsuits. The only viable choice for the debtor is to protect as much real and personal property as possible before a creditor has a chance to file a lawsuit. If the debtor has not been served a civil suit summons they may still legally transfer property, remove themselves from bank accounts, and so forth.
A chapter 13 can be filed if it has been at least two years from the date the first filing was dismissed.
Yes, but with new bankruptcy laws having been implemented it may prove somewhat difficult. The involved parties will need to prove to the trustee/court that they are unable to meet the obligation. More than likely the trustee will suggest the "13" be modified rather than dismissed. If the BK is dismissed the debtor loses all BK protection and creditors may pursue collection, repossession and lawsuits as the so choose.
Under the bankruptcy laws effective on October 17, 2005, Chapter 7 cannot be filed unless the debtor was discharged from the previous Chapter 7 or bankruptcy more than eight years ago. The debtor cannot file a Chapter 13 unless: (1) the debtor received a discharge under Chapter 7, 11 or 12 more than four years ago; or (2) the debtor received a discharge under Chapter 13 more than two years ago.
The debtor (or the debtor's attorney) can do this with a simple filing - usually an "Ex Parte Motion to Convert Chapter 13 to a Chapter 7." Providing the debtor's bankruptcy has not previously been converted already, the debtor/debtor attorney can do this without the permission or advance permission of either the bankruptcy judge or the Chapter 13 trustee that is managing the bankruptcy up until that point (hence, the "Ex Parte" part of the document). There are notice requirements - check with your local bankruptcy district to see who this needs to be mailed out to. Also, there is usually a small fee involved (it usually involves the debtor paying the difference in cost between a Chapter 13 and a Chapter 7 filing, but may be different - again, check with your local bankruptcy court). The debtor will be required to go through another 341 creditor's meeting with the new Chapter 7 trustee.
In a chapter 7, the debtor's estate consists of all property owned by the debtor which has not been exempted or is subject to a lien and has little or no equity. The trustee takes and sells the non-exempt assets that are not subject to a lien. If the debtor cannot pay the trustee the value of equity, the trustee may force the sale of the encumbered asset or the debtor will have to convert to a chapter 13.
PROBABLY if one is in a Chapter 13 and that debtor converts to Chapter 7, that debtor can re-file another Chapter 13 immediately after the Chapter 7 discharge. I say "probably" rather than "yes" for a few reasons: (1) There is no Bankruptcy Code section that prevents immediate filing of a Chapter 13 after a Chapter 7, but a creditor could object to the new Chapter 13 and argue that the debtor is abusing the Bankruptcy Code, an argument the Court may or may not be swayed by based on the circumstances of the case; (2) If a debtor voluntarily dismisses a Chapter 13 once a Motion for Relief from Stay has been filed in the Chapter 13 case, that debtor is automatically barred from re-filing another Chapter 13 for 180 days (see 11 U.S.C. 109(g)(2)). So, a creditor may argue that conversion to Chapter 7 is akin to voluntary dismissal and so the debtor should be barred from filing another Chapter 13 for 180 days if a Motion for Relief was filed in the prior Chapter 13 case (and I have no idea if such an argument would work for the creditor); and (3) Different districts may have different case law affecting the answer to this question, so it's probably best to consult a lawyer in your area. Please note that nothing in this posting or in any other posting constitutes legal advice; this is simply my understanding of the facts, which I do not warrant, and I am not suggesting any course of action or inaction to any person.
The time limit for a discharged chapter 7 or 13 bankruptcy to remain on a credit report has always been 10 years. A dismissed chapter 7 wil remain 10 years, a dismissed chapter 13 will remain 7 years.