In criminal matters other state's definitely can prosecute you if the offence allegedly occured or was detected in another state. Usually there will be some negotiation between state agencies to decide where it is most convenient to try people.
Similarly, in non-criminal matters other state's may have a stake in the outcome of a case and may thus initiate proceedings against a person living elsewhere.
If it is a different nation-state, ie involving an offence in a different country, then the foreign state's ability to prosecute will depend on whether you are still within their borders or not. If you have already left their country then it will be more difficult to get you back- ie you will need to be extradited back to stand trial, although there are cases where people are tried without actually being there, and this will affect your ability to return to that country. In criminal matters other state's definitely can prosecute you if the offence allegedly occured or was detected in another state. Usually there will be some negotiation between state agencies to decide where it is most convenient to try people.
Similarly, in non-criminal matters other state's may have a stake in the outcome of a case and may thus initiate proceedings against a person living elsewhere.
If it is a different nation-state, ie involving an offence in a different country, then the foreign state's ability to prosecute will depend on whether you are still within their borders or not. If you have already left their country then it will be more difficult to get you back- ie you will need to be extradited back to stand trial, although there are cases where people are tried without actually being there, and this will affect your ability to return to that country. ADDED: All the foregoing is true insofar as criminal and civil proceedings are concerned - but it is ALSO true in certain strictly administrative matters. i.e. - if you hold a license to do business, or some kind of permit to do 'whatever' - even though you may not be a resident of that state, the other state also exercises a certain amount of limited jurisdiction over your activity as permitted by their licensure or permit. Also, if you own property in that state but are not a 'resident.' There are many possibilities. You would have to be more specific in your question for a more definitive answer.
The state in which an offense takes place has jurisdiction over the incident. If court is required, it will take place in the state of the offense.
What is your definition of a "territory?" If they are not self-governing, territories are under the jurisdiction of the Federal Government and the individual states have no jurisdiction over them.
No, they are completely different court systems. One has jurisdiction over state matters, the other over federal matters.
Yes, that's exactly what "jurisdiction" means.
Each local government has control over its own regulations, and the laws vary from jurisdiction-to-jurisdiction. Contact your local municipality.
The Supreme Court has jurisdiction over all actions involving foreign state parties. In addition, it has jurisdiction over all controversies between a State and the United States, and it has jurisdiction over proceedings by a State against aliens or citizens of another State.
Diversity jurisdiction is a basis for federal courts to exercise jurisdiction if the parties to a civil cause of action are residents of different states and the amount in controversy is large enough to make use of federal resources practical. A state may legitimately exercise jurisdiction either if it has in rem jurisdiction over the property or in personam jurisdiction over all parties to the dispute.
This is a question of jurisdiction. Who has legal oversight? The state where the accident occured has jurisdiction over the case, and specifically the county. Even if both parties move out of state.
The authority of a court to rule on certain cases is known as the jurisdiction of the court. State courts have jurisdiction over matters within that state, and different levels of courts have jurisdiction over lawsuits involving different amounts of money. Federal courts have jurisdiction over lawsuits between citizens of different states, or cases based on federal statutes.
TRUE: Under the "sliding-scale" standard the courts have identified that substancial business conducted over the internet (with contracts and sales,; for example) that jurisdiction in over an out-of-state defendant in this case is proper.
The Supreme Court of the United States has original and exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving disputes between the States.
Guwahati