Assuming the same vehicle model, driving habits, etc., the answer is nearly always yes for the simple reason that used car is worth less than a new car. Some parts of the overall bill will normally be the same (e.g. uninsured-motorist coverage) because they're independent of the car itself, but a component such as collision damage will almost always decrease with the age of the car.
No. Generally speaking, used cars are actually less expensive to insure than new cars. This varies greatly depending on model however.
less than £50
It depends on where you store it, your age, how long you have been riding, as well as the engine size. Overall they are much cheaper to insure than any car
Clean burning and cost less than gasoline or diesel.
A lot of money, but less than what is used now. So around 15$
The > is used for greater than. The < is used for less than.
its used the same way as now but it cost less in past 1900.its used the same way as now but it cost less in past 1900.
If you want a good GPS, then probably not. If you find one less than $100, then it might not be working correctly, or is not updated enough to give you correct directions.
I got mine used with less than 50 rounds through it for 350.00
used to cost 40 pounds no it would cost less
So the cost value of the metal used would be less than the face value of the coin. As copper was cheap.
Some are: 1. Less Steel used...less cost. 2. Less Weight for a given design strength. 3. Less Weight for a given Length.